I agree with Mr. Woodgate. Leading off with the Forrestal, without
adequately explaining the failure mechanism, gives an unrealistic and
misleading introduction to the subject. There was a degraded shield
termination that allowed rf to couple to EED leads. For an entity whose
emission challenge
: Help wanted with succinct subject description for
non-special ists
I should reiterate from my original message that the text I posted is the
introduction to an article, not a complete article.
The example was included to engage the reader from the start; demonstrate
that electromagnetic
I read in !emc-pstc that Ken Javor ken.ja...@emccompliance.com wrote
(in baa8f534.2522%ken.ja...@emccompliance.com) about 'Help wanted with
succinct subject description for non-specialists' on Thu, 27 Mar
2003:
It is interesting, nonetheless, to note that the disaster occurred
I read in !emc-pstc that Bill Morse bill...@verifone.com wrote (in
614cc7c21856d1118da30060b06b487306084...@smf-nt-mail1.verifone.com)
about 'Help wanted with succinct subject description for non-special
ists' on Fri, 28 Mar 2003:
When the missile launched it struck another aircraft
wanted with succinct subject description for
non-special ists
In 1967 off the coast of Vietnam, a jet landing on the aircraft carrier
U.S.S. Forrestal was briefly illuminated by carrier-based radar. This is
quite a normal event, however the energy from the radar caused a stray
,
considered part of the root cause.
R/S,
Brian
-Original Message-
From: King, Richard
Sent: Thursday, March 27, 2003 7:18 AM
To: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
Subject: RE: Help wanted with succinct subject description for
non-special ists
I should reiterate from my original message
description for
non-special ists
I read in !emc-pstc that King, Richard richard.k...@uk.thalesgroup.com
wrote (in C02943801230D611919D00508BDF0C246EB61A@RTWEXCH) about 'Help
wanted with succinct subject description for non-specialists' on
Thu, 27 Mar 2003:
In 1967 off the coast of Vietnam
I read in !emc-pstc that King, Richard richard.k...@uk.thalesgroup.com
wrote (in C02943801230D611919D00508BDF0C246EB61A@RTWEXCH) about 'Help
wanted with succinct subject description for non-specialists' on
Thu, 27 Mar 2003:
In 1967 off the coast of Vietnam, a jet landing on the aircraft
-Original Message-
From: King, Richard [mailto:richard.k...@uk.thalesgroup.com]
Sent: Monday, March 24, 2003 3:07 AM
To: 'emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org'
Subject: Help wanted with succinct subject description for
non-specialists
Dear all,
I am working on an article about EMC for an
Dear All,
Many thanks for your collective help with this question. I attach my final
text below in case others on the list have a use for it.
Electromagnetic Compatibility (EMC)
In 1967 off the coast of Vietnam, a jet landing on the aircraft carrier
U.S.S. Forrestal was briefly illuminated by
To me, all this regulation can be synopsized:
Electronics shall not put out stuff - conducted or radiated
Electronics shall not be upset when stuff comes in -
susceptibility to conducted or radiated.
Difference in attitude between US and elsewhere:
It is my understanding that in the US
I read in !emc-pstc that robert Macy m...@california.com wrote (in
web-42369...@california.com) about 'Help wanted with succinct subject
description for non-special ists' on Tue, 25 Mar 2003:
But in the EC and elsewhere,
they thought to add tests ahead of time in order to
establish a minimum
-Original Message-
From: C N [mailto:abx...@hotmail.com]
Sent: Monday, March 24, 2003 10:48 PM
To: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
Subject: Re: Help wanted with succinct subject description for
non-specialists
For non-technical people ... in other words KISS.
EMC is two things:
I
13 matches
Mail list logo
