Re: IEC vs. EN

I read in !emc-pstc that Sam Wismer swis...@acstestlab.com wrote (in 000501c2b98b$166cb190$0b01000a@sam) about 'IEC vs. EN' on Sat, 11 Jan 2003: Thanks for the clarification. Is there any documentation to that affect, or is it common practice to apply the EN transition period to the IEC basic

RE: IEC vs. EN

...@majordomo.ieee.org] On Behalf Of John Woodgate Sent: Saturday, January 11, 2003 8:43 AM To: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org Subject: Re: IEC vs. EN I read in !emc-pstc that Sam Wismer swis...@acstestlab.com wrote (in 001001c2b8c4$7df00d20$0b01000a@sam) about 'IEC vs. EN' on Fri, 10 Jan 2003: Case

Re: IEC vs. EN

I read in !emc-pstc that Sam Wismer swis...@acstestlab.com wrote (in 001001c2b8c4$7df00d20$0b01000a@sam) about 'IEC vs. EN' on Fri, 10 Jan 2003: Case in point:  EN 61000-4-4 Amd. 2 DoW for the superseded standard is 7/04 however EN55024 calls out IEC 61000-4-4. No, it only appears

IEC vs. EN

When IEC standards are called for in Generic or Product specific EU standards, is it inappropriate to use EN standards? If so, does the transition period for a superseded EN standard apply to the IEC standard or is the IEC presumed to be effective immediately if the IEC standard does not publish