Re: Q. on Res Bandwith performace traceabiity

2003-09-03 Thread John Woodgate
I read in !emc-pstc that Coleman, David david.cole...@racalinst.co.uk wrote (in 7103C9D213EBD111971400104B4968149EC0CD@ntexch- f.racalinst.co.uk) about 'Q. on Res Bandwith performace traceabiity' on Wed, 3 Sep 2003: Why would the IEC standard for miniature fuses detail these abbreviations??? I

RE: Q. on Res Bandwith performace traceabiity

2003-09-03 Thread Coleman, David
performace traceabiity I read in !emc-pstc that Brent DeWitt bdew...@ix.netcom.com wrote (in jfekiiblahflflapjdmdeecadfaa.bdew...@ix.netcom.com) about 'Q. on Res Bandwith performace traceabiity' on Tue, 2 Sep 2003: Are we done now? No. All you guys are using non-standard abbreviations. Go read IEC

Re: Q. on Res Bandwith performace traceabiity

2003-09-03 Thread John Woodgate
I read in !emc-pstc that Brent DeWitt bdew...@ix.netcom.com wrote (in jfekiiblahflflapjdmdeecadfaa.bdew...@ix.netcom.com) about 'Q. on Res Bandwith performace traceabiity' on Tue, 2 Sep 2003: Are we done now? No. All you guys are using non-standard abbreviations. Go read IEC 60127-3

Re: Q. on Res Bandwith performace traceabiity

2003-09-03 Thread John Woodgate
I read in !emc-pstc that f...@dctolight.net wrote (in 41196.198.246.16. 251.1062534076.squir...@webmail.dctolight.net) about 'Q. on Res Bandwith performace traceabiity' on Tue, 2 Sep 2003: Since not everyone measures power we also define 0dbv = 1 mvolt into 600 ohms. Well, you might define

RE: Q. on Res Bandwith performace traceabiity

2003-09-02 Thread Brent DeWitt
...@majordomo.ieee.org]On Behalf Of f...@dctolight.net Sent: Tuesday, September 02, 2003 2:21 PM To: ken.ja...@emccompliance.com Cc: f...@dctolight.net; cgrassospri...@earthlink.net; emc-p...@ieee.org Subject: Re: Q. on Res Bandwith performace traceabiity Incorrect. A dB is a dB. Correct! But who

RE: Q. on Res Bandwith performace traceabiity

2003-09-02 Thread John Shinn
, September 02, 2003 1:21 PM To: ken.ja...@emccompliance.com Cc: f...@dctolight.net; cgrassospri...@earthlink.net; emc-p...@ieee.org Subject: Re: Q. on Res Bandwith performace traceabiity Incorrect. A dB is a dB. Correct! But who is talking about db? I'm sure you know that db is a dimensionless

Re: Q. on Res Bandwith performace traceabiity

2003-09-02 Thread Ken Javor
-sci.com Reply-To: john.sh...@sanmina-sci.com Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2003 15:08:57 -0700 To: f...@dctolight.net, ken.ja...@emccompliance.com Cc: cgrassospri...@earthlink.net, emc-p...@ieee.org Subject: RE: Q. on Res Bandwith performace traceabiity Fred: Correction - a dBV is referenced to 1 Volt. R

Re: Q. on Res Bandwith performace traceabiity

2003-09-02 Thread Ken Javor
(PDT) To: ken.ja...@emccompliance.com Cc: f...@dctolight.net, cgrassospri...@earthlink.net, emc-p...@ieee.org Subject: Re: Q. on Res Bandwith performace traceabiity Incorrect. A dB is a dB. Correct! But who is talking about db? I'm sure you know that db is a dimensionless ratio. I

Re: Q. on Res Bandwith performace traceabiity

2003-09-02 Thread f...@dctolight.net
...@earthlink.net Reply-To: Charles Grasso cgrassospri...@earthlink.net Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2003 07:06:13 -0700 To: Emc-Pstc emc-p...@ieee.org Subject: Q. on Res Bandwith performace traceabiity Greetings: Does anyone know if the Resolution Bandwidth filter performance is tracable to a given

Re: Q. on Res Bandwith performace traceabiity

2003-08-31 Thread Cortland Richmond
CISPR 16-1 and C63.2. I seem to recall seeing a bandwidth mask in CISPR 16 which specified both width and slope of the filter attenuation in three ranges, from 0 to 3 dB down, 3 to 6 dB down and 6 db to (I think) 40 or 50 dB down. Cortland This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product

Re: Q. on Res Bandwith performace traceabiity

2003-08-31 Thread Ken Javor
: Thu, 28 Aug 2003 07:06:13 -0700 To: Emc-Pstc emc-p...@ieee.org Subject: Q. on Res Bandwith performace traceabiity Greetings: Does anyone know if the Resolution Bandwidth filter performance is tracable to a given standard and which standard that might be? I was wondering if the rool

Re: Q. on Res Bandwith performace traceabiity

2003-08-28 Thread Ken Javor
: Thursday, August 28, 2003 1:48 PM To: Charles Grasso; Emc-Pstc Subject: Re: Q. on Res Bandwith performace traceabiity My understanding is that it is the 6 dB points which are cited as the bandwidth. I'm not up on CISPR 16 but to entirely specify the bandwidth the 60 dB down points are also

Re: Q. on Res Bandwith performace traceabiity

2003-08-28 Thread Ken Javor
cgrassospri...@earthlink.net Reply-To: Charles Grasso cgrassospri...@earthlink.net Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2003 07:06:13 -0700 To: Emc-Pstc emc-p...@ieee.org Subject: Q. on Res Bandwith performace traceabiity Greetings: Does anyone know if the Resolution Bandwidth filter performance is tracable

Q. on Res Bandwith performace traceabiity

2003-08-28 Thread Charles Grasso
Greetings: Does anyone know if the Resolution Bandwidth filter performance is tracable to a given standard and which standard that might be? I was wondering if the rool-off after the 3dB points is specificed as a standard for ALL analysers. I am assuming that the anaswer is Yes as chaos would