who understand binary and
those who don't. J. Paxman
From: Bill Owsley [mailto:wdows...@yahoo.com]
Sent: 29 October 2010 23:26
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] Different Radiated Emissions results at different labs
*** WARNING *** This message
EE.ORG
Subject: RE: [PSES] Different Radiated Emissions results at different labs
You should be using a different test lab.
We have never had that much of a variation on the same EUT. I attribute that
to using a true EMI receiver, which has much better amplitude accuracy then a
spectrum anal
In message
,
dated Fri, 29 Oct 2010, Larry Stillings
writes:
>I have seen products leave the lab and come back and have the same
>profile within 1 dB or less.
It's reasonable to think that the repeatability is dependent on the fine
details of the product and its AEs and cables.
--
OOO - Ow
You should be using a different test lab.
We have never had that much of a variation on the same EUT. I attribute that
to using a true EMI receiver, which has much better amplitude accuracy then a
spectrum analyzer. But that is a whole different discussion. I have seen
products leave the lab and
4 matches
Mail list logo