RE: [PSES] Different Radiated Emissions results at different labs

2010-11-01 Thread emc-p...@ieee.org
who understand binary and those who don't. J. Paxman From: Bill Owsley [mailto:wdows...@yahoo.com] Sent: 29 October 2010 23:26 To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG Subject: Re: [PSES] Different Radiated Emissions results at different labs *** WARNING *** This message

RE: [PSES] Different Radiated Emissions results at different labs

2010-10-29 Thread emc-p...@ieee.org
EE.ORG Subject: RE: [PSES] Different Radiated Emissions results at different labs You should be using a different test lab. We have never had that much of a variation on the same EUT. I attribute that to using a true EMI receiver, which has much better amplitude accuracy then a spectrum anal

Re: [PSES] Different Radiated Emissions results at different labs

2010-10-29 Thread emc-p...@ieee.org
In message , dated Fri, 29 Oct 2010, Larry Stillings writes: >I have seen products leave the lab and come back and have the same >profile within 1 dB or less. It's reasonable to think that the repeatability is dependent on the fine details of the product and its AEs and cables. -- OOO - Ow

RE: [PSES] Different Radiated Emissions results at different labs

2010-10-29 Thread emc-p...@ieee.org
You should be using a different test lab. We have never had that much of a variation on the same EUT. I attribute that to using a true EMI receiver, which has much better amplitude accuracy then a spectrum analyzer. But that is a whole different discussion. I have seen products leave the lab and