RE: Does anyone system test PCs anymore? - Q on new procedures

2003-11-17 Thread Wiz
] On Behalf Of Grasso, Charles Sent: Friday, November 14, 2003 9:40 AM To: 'John Woodgate'; 'emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org' Subject: RE: Does anyone system test PCs anymore? - Q on new procedures John et al. Thanks for your observations. If I understand the new methodology then I (a mnaufacturer) can

Re: Does anyone system test PCs anymore? - Q on new procedures

2003-11-14 Thread John Woodgate
I read in !emc-pstc that Grasso, Charles charles.gra...@echostar.com wrote (in DEDA59C30D344E4182D1A4DAB86C5B78082868C2@riv- exch2.echostar.com) about 'Does anyone system test PCs anymore? - Q on new procedures' on Fri, 14 Nov 2003: If I understand the new methodology then I (a mnaufacturer)

RE: Does anyone system test PCs anymore? - Q on new procedures

2003-11-14 Thread Grasso, Charles
anyone system test PCs anymore? - Q on new procedures Is FCC+FCC= FCC , that is line the old CE+CE = CE line? AFAIK, if the set up passed, it 'may' not be tested again. And 'may' is rather meaningless. Shall is the right words. In the past, there is always a phrase This device complies

RE: Does anyone system test PCs anymore? - Q on new procedures

2003-11-14 Thread Grasso, Charles
...@jmwa.demon.co.uk] Sent: Friday, November 14, 2003 2:19 AM To: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org Subject: Re: Does anyone system test PCs anymore? - Q on new procedures I read in !emc-pstc that Cortland Richmond 72146@compuserve.com wrote (in 200311131630_mc3-1-5a13-7...@compuserve.com) about 'Does

Re: Does anyone system test PCs anymore? - Q on new procedures

2003-11-14 Thread John Woodgate
I read in !emc-pstc that Cortland Richmond 72146@compuserve.com wrote (in 200311131630_mc3-1-5a13-7...@compuserve.com) about 'Does anyone system test PCs anymore? - Q on new procedures' on Thu, 13 Nov 2003: Can a monitor purchased from an OEM have a company label slapped on it and sold

Re: Does anyone system test PCs anymore? - Q on new procedures

2003-11-13 Thread Wan Juang Foo
Is FCC+FCC= FCC , that is line the old CE+CE = CE line? AFAIK, if the set up passed, it 'may' not be tested again. And 'may' is rather meaningless. Shall is the right words. In the past, there is always a phrase This device complies with part 15 of the FCC Rules. Operation is subjected to

Re: Does anyone system test PCs anymore? - Q on new procedures

2003-11-13 Thread Cortland Richmond
Charles Grasso wrote Can a monitor purchased from an OEM have a company label slapped on it and sold WITHOUT the company testing it in a system? Looks like it! One of my EMI horror stories concerns a monitor I found could make a computer NEXT to it, not even turned on, exceed the Part 15