]
Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 11:24 AM
To: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
Subject: RE: EN55022:1998 and telecom ports
Unfortunately, EN 55022 is the only available emissions standard for CCTV
products used for security applications. Even the standard for professional
video equipment, EN55103-1
31, 2003 8:33 AM
To: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
Subject: Re: EN55022:1998 and telecom ports
I read in !emc-pstc that david_ster...@ademco.com wrote (in 2DF7C54A75B
dd311b61700508b64231002c5b...@nyhqex1.ademconet.com) about
'EN55022:1998 and telecom ports' on Fri, 31 Jan 2003:
Earthing STP
I read in !emc-pstc that Wagner, John P (John) johnwag...@avaya.com
wrote (in 4203D61676D0AE468AA5CEA90A891C1302A01467@cof110avexu4.global.
avaya.com) about 'EN55022:1998 and telecom ports' on Fri, 31 Jan 2003:
By the way, CISPR/F has nothing whatsoever to do with ITE. It is CISPR/I and
From: Cortland Richmond [mailto:72146@compuserve.com]
Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 10:21 AM
To: ieee pstc list
Subject: RE: EN55022:1998 and telecom ports
David Sterner wrote:
UTP has been repeatedly shown to radiate less than STP.
Telcordia GR-1089 exempts STP from intrabuilding
I read in !emc-pstc that richwo...@tycoint.com wrote (in 846BF526A205F8
4BA2B6045BBF7E9A6A04675BCE@flbocexu05) about 'EN55022:1998 and telecom
ports' on Fri, 31 Jan 2003:
The standard also includes tests for coax and
alludes to emissions caused by imperfect shielding. That seems to imply that
a
this in mind.
Richard Woods
Sensormatic Electronics
Tyco International
From: Pettit, Ghery [mailto:ghery.pet...@intel.com]
Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 11:39 AM
To: 'richwo...@tycoint.com'; emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
Subject: RE: EN55022:1998 and telecom ports
Richard,
Cameras, monitors
David Sterner wrote:
UTP has been repeatedly shown to radiate less than STP.
Telcordia GR-1089 exempts STP from intrabuilding surges; the shield is
assumed to carry them. This makes it attractive for US telecom designers
whose equipment uses Ethernet.
Cortland
This message is from the
From: david_ster...@ademco.com [mailto:david_ster...@ademco.com]
Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 5:35 AM
To: ghery.pet...@intel.com; gary.mcintu...@worldwidepackets.com;
richwo...@tycoint.com; emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
Subject: RE: EN55022:1998 and telecom ports
Ghery -
Ethernet on coax (10Base2
I read in !emc-pstc that david_ster...@ademco.com wrote (in 2DF7C54A75B
dd311b61700508b64231002c5b...@nyhqex1.ademconet.com) about
'EN55022:1998 and telecom ports' on Fri, 31 Jan 2003:
Earthing STP shields at both ends is potential safety hazard,
How does a safety hazard arise?
--
Regards,
Richard,
Cameras, monitors, etc are not ITE. CISPR 22 does not apply to them.
Ghery Pettit
Intel
From: richwo...@tycoint.com [mailto:richwo...@tycoint.com]
Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 7:20 AM
To: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
Subject: RE: EN55022:1998 and telecom ports
OK, so widely
...@avaya.com
From: John Woodgate [mailto:j...@jmwa.demon.co.uk]
Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 6:55 AM
To: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
Subject: Re: EN55022:1998 and telecom ports
I read in !emc-pstc that richwo...@tycoint.com wrote (in 846BF526A205F8
4BA2B6045BBF7E9A6A04675BB4@flbocexu05) about
Kristiaan [mailto:carpenti...@thmulti.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2003 5:54 PM
To: 'richwo...@tycoint.com'; emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
Subject: RE: EN55022:1998 and telecom ports
Richard,
In addition to Gherys explanation of the note, there is also the definition
itself that inherently excludes
I read in !emc-pstc that richwo...@tycoint.com wrote (in 846BF526A205F8
4BA2B6045BBF7E9A6A04675BB4@flbocexu05) about 'EN55022:1998 and telecom
ports' on Thu, 30 Jan 2003:
EN55022:1998 defines telecommunication ports as Ports which are intended
to be connected to telecommunications networks (e.g.
, but that is
EN60950, not EN55022.
David
From: Pettit, Ghery [mailto:ghery.pet...@intel.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2003 5:27 PM
To: 'Gary McInturff'; Pettit, Ghery; richwo...@tycoint.com;
emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
Subject: RE: EN55022:1998 and telecom ports
Gary,
Unfortunately
Richard,
In addition to Gherys explanation of the note, there is also the definition
itself that inherently excludes certain interfaces by means of the wordings
widely dispersed and multi-user. But I agree that adding some more
definitions of interfaces would help, also myself.
Clause 6.3:
Subject: RE: EN55022:1998 and telecom ports
Glad to hear this! Ethernet lines are interconnection of ITE
components and not telecommunications cables.
Asbestos shorts on - fire away.
Gary
From: Pettit, Ghery [mailto:ghery.pet...@intel.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2003
-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
Subject: RE: EN55022:1998 and telecom ports
Richard,
Further clarification to this question was provided by the addition of the
following note at the end of article 3.6 of CISPR 22:1997 as part of
Amendment 2 which was published in October of last year.
NOTE A port
30, 2003 1:45 PM
To: 'richwo...@tycoint.com'; emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
Subject: RE: EN55022:1998 and telecom ports
Richard,
Further clarification to this question was provided by the addition of the
following note at the end of article 3.6 of CISPR 22:1997 as part of
Amendment 2 which
Richard,
Further clarification to this question was provided by the addition of the
following note at the end of article 3.6 of CISPR 22:1997 as part of
Amendment 2 which was published in October of last year.
NOTE A port generally intended for interconnection of components of an ITE
system
19 matches
Mail list logo
