Re: ETL vs UL

2009-03-04 Thread emc-p...@ieee.org
that lost its push I guess. -- Sent using BlackBerry -Original Message- From: Dan Roman dan.ro...@dialogic.com To: Jason Chesley; EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG Sent: Wed Mar 04 14:27:18 2009 Subject: RE: ETL vs UL Jason, Don't CSA

Re: ETL vs UL

2009-03-04 Thread emc-p...@ieee.org
. -- Sent using BlackBerry -Original Message- From: Dan Roman dan.ro...@dialogic.com To: Jason Chesley; EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG Sent: Wed Mar 04 14:27:18 2009 Subject: RE: ETL vs UL Jason, Don't CSA and UL have an MOU for certain

Re: ETL vs UL

2009-03-04 Thread emc-p...@ieee.org
It all but died several years ago. It was an industry led effort that lost its push I guess. Sent using BlackBerry From: Dan Roman dan.ro...@dialogic.com To: Jason Chesley; EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG Sent: Wed Mar 04 14:27:18 2009 Subject: RE: ETL vs UL Jason

RE: ETL vs UL

2009-03-04 Thread emc-p...@ieee.org
Jason, Don't CSA and UL have an MOU for certain product categories where they will accept each others Certification/Recognition/Listing? Dan From: Jason Chesley [mailto:jason.ches...@csa-international.org] Sent: Tuesday, March 03, 2009 6:44 PM To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG Subject: Re:

Re: ETL vs UL

2009-03-04 Thread emc-p...@ieee.org
Cody They would require testing on the component and also they would want to control it under a special follow-up program. If the component had a CB report to an appropriate standard and the US/Canadian component standard is harmonized with the IEC standard, they typically would not required to

Re: ETL vs UL

2009-03-03 Thread emc-p...@ieee.org
Only the leader of a given component category will be acceptable to other major NRTLs. Assuming this is an electrical component going into an electrical system I know of no UL engineer who would accept the Intertek 'recognized' (?) component. I know we will not. To be fair, UL would not likely

RE: ETL vs. UL

2005-03-11 Thread owner-emc-p...@listserv.ieee.org
_ From: owner-emc-p...@listserv.ieee.org mailto:owner-emc-p...@listserv.ieee.org] On Behalf Of Reginald Henry Sent: Friday, March 11, 2005 11:04 AM To: emc-p...@ieee.org Subject: RE: ETL vs. UL All, I know that most of the general population is aware of the UL mark applied to almost all

RE: ETL vs. UL

2005-03-11 Thread Reginald Henry
All, I know that most of the general population is aware of the UL mark applied to almost all appliances, equipment, etc, and that UL is the accepted safety marked to have on a company's product, at least here in the USA . However, because of UL's reduction in staff ( which is causing huge