In a message dated 11/8/02 7:56:16 AM Eastern Standard Time,
chris_al...@eur.3com.com writes:
Company B should issue the DoC. But to show due diligence they should
obtain a
DoC (and copies of test reports) from Company A.
That makes two DoC's for one product. If company A issues a
-(0)3-5339019
Mobile: + 972-(0)54-838175
http://www.itl.co.il
http://www.i-spec.com
-Original Message-
From: Chris Allen [mailto:chris_al...@eur.3com.com]
Sent: Friday, November 08, 2002 2:54 PM
To: John Woodgate
Cc: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
Subject: Re: EU DoC - ATEX Examples
I
I read in !emc-pstc that John Allen john.al...@era.co.uk wrote (in
BFE68AB0084CD311B4FB00508B014C8703CF9CD3@MERCURY) about 'EU DoC - ATEX
Examples' on Fri, 8 Nov 2002:
In response to John's comment/question, the answer could well be that the
Commission and it's national enforcing authorities do
Hi Folks
In response to John's comment/question, the answer could well be that the
Commission and it's national enforcing authorities do not want to be faced
with the possibility of having chase 2(or even 3 or more under a multiple
branding situation) companies over a non-compliance/safety
Hi Folks
Whilst investigating something else today, I came upon the Commission
Guidance Notes for the implementation of the ATEX Directive :
http://europa.eu.int/comm/enterprise/atex/guide/guide_en.pdf
On Page 112 in reply to Question 13 (about something else), Case 1, 2nd
paragraph, states
5 matches
Mail list logo
