RE: FDA Reports for Laser Transceivers

1999-03-23 Thread Peter Merguerian
' pe...@itl.co.il, EMC-PST emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org Subject:RE: FDA Reports for Laser Transceivers Date sent: Mon, 22 Mar 1999 17:01:57 -0800 Send reply to: Gary McInturff gmcintu...@packetengines.com Have the vendor send the letter

RE: RE: FDA Reports for Laser Transceivers

1999-03-23 Thread Lesmeister, Glenn
[mailto:s_doug...@ecrm.com] Sent: Tuesday, March 23, 1999 8:01 AM To: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org Subject:Re: RE: FDA Reports for Laser Transceivers In the past I have had my problems with UL and lasers. The FDA

Re: RE: FDA Reports for Laser Transceivers

1999-03-23 Thread Scott Douglas
In the past I have had my problems with UL and lasers. The FDA does not measure laser energy. The CDRH (part of the FDA) collects reports of laser products from manufacturers. These reports are 25 pages long and filled with technical information about the product. There are usually a significant

RE: FDA Reports for Laser Transceivers

1999-03-23 Thread Gary McInturff
Have the vendor send the letter of ascension or whatever the FDA calls it directly to UL. If the vendor doesn't have it yet, be prepared for a lengthy delay. The FDA isn't too quick about these things for resource reasons, I suppose. UL has to have that information because they do not have the