I read in !emc-pstc that richwo...@tycoint.com wrote (in 846BF526A205F8
4BA2B6045BBF7E9A6A01F140FA@flbocexu05) about 'General Product Safety
Directive', on Tue, 30 Apr 2002:
Now, back to the original question. I found the following definition of
professional apparatus in EN 55103-2 (immunity for
Well, this series sure took a left turn and accelerated hurriedly out of
site of the original intent which was to determine what the term consumer
means as used in the GPSD. The imaginary product example I put forth was
intended solely to support the question, and I in no way advocated that such
-Subject: RE: General Product Safety Directive - sorry missed something
-
-
-
-With regards to the need to subject something running from a 9V
-battery to a battery (pun not intended) of safety approvals, to me
-this shows how some aspects of regulatory control are just a solution
-searching desperately
: Monday, April 29, 2002 4:11 PM
-To: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
-Subject: Re: General Product Safety Directive - sorry missed something
-
-
-
-I read in !emc-pstc that Robert Wilson robert_wil...@tirsys.com wrote
-(in 3FF57405336C9B4C976A1819F860A2560F698B@xng_tirsys.TIRSYS.COM)
-about 'General Product
I read in !emc-pstc that Robert Wilson robert_wil...@tirsys.com wrote
(in 3FF57405336C9B4C976A1819F860A2560F698B@xng_tirsys.TIRSYS.COM)
about 'General Product Safety Directive - sorry missed something', on
Mon, 29 Apr 2002:
With regards to the need to subject something running from a 9V
battery
To: richwo...@tycoint.com; emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
Subject: RE: General Product Safety Directive - sorry missed something
-Let's take an example of a non-rechargable 9V battery operated -ITE
product(sic)
Consider the liability and your defense - it you review to the ITE
standard
then you have
-Let's take an example of a non-rechargable 9V battery operated -ITE
product(sic)
Consider the liability and your defense - it you review to the ITE standard
then you have performed due diligence - if you do not review to the ITE
standard then you have not!
If you assume that the product
-
From: owner-emc-p...@ieee.org [mailto:owner-emc-p...@ieee.org]On Behalf
Of John Allen
Sent: Tuesday, March 28, 2000 4:54 PM
To: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
Subject: RE: General Product Safety Directive
Hi folks
Very interesting and I am glad that Richard has spotted this as I
was under
the same
Hi folks
Very interesting and I am glad that Richard has spotted this as I was under
the same impression (as, I think, were/are many other people).
However, I personally doubt it makes much difference to the TECHNICAL
safety requirements that should be applied to any specific product. These
Hello Jeff,
To find the General Product Safety Directive link, just visit the Safety
Link at:
www.safetylink.com
Then, using your browser's search tool, search on the term 92/59/EEC or
on the acronyn, GPSD and you will find the link for this document.
Regards, Art
Hi Jeff,
The GPS directive is designated as 92/59/EEC (an html copy of it is attached).
It's posting info in the Official journal is NO. L 228 , 11/08/1992 P.
0024-0032. Sorry, I can't seem to find it again on the web. But, searching on
the following web site may produce it for you.
Try looking for Directive 85/374. As I recall, it applies to consumer
products.
Mike Sherman
FSI International
msher...@fsi-intl.com
-
This message is coming from the emc-pstc discussion list.
To cancel your subscription, send mail to majord...@ieee.org
with the single line: unsubscribe
12 matches
Mail list logo
