RE: RE: EN55024 question

2000-09-06 Thread Debbie Mallory
ssage- From: Kazimier Gawrzyjal [mailto:k...@nortelnetworks.com] Sent: Tuesday, September 05, 2000 11:41 AM To: emc-p...@ieee.org Subject: RE: RE: EN55024 question Folks, Just to add to the mix of questions so far, here's a few more that Debbie may wish to consider: 1) is the demarkation

RE: RE: EN55024 question

2000-09-05 Thread Bandele Adepoju
, September 01, 2000 8:00 AM To: emc-p...@ieee.org Subject: RE: RE: EN55024 question Bandele - Please forgive an ignorant question: I'm not going to pretend to be an EMC standards expert, but I fail to see how the presence or absence of processing an incoming signal has anything to do

RE: RE: EN55024 question

2000-09-05 Thread Kazimier Gawrzyjal
ks.com> calgary...@aol.com <mailto:calgary...@aol.com> -Original Message- From: Tarver, Peter [SC1:9031:EXCH] Sent: Friday, September 01, 2000 9:00 AM To: emc-p...@ieee.org Subject: RE: RE: EN55024 question Bandele - Please forgive an ignorant question: I'm not going to

RE: RE: EN55024 question

2000-09-01 Thread Peter Tarver
Bandele - Please forgive an ignorant question: I'm not going to pretend to be an EMC standards expert, but I fail to see how the presence or absence of processing an incoming signal has anything to do with whether there is a direct or indirect connection to outside lines. To wit: "outside" is eas