I read in !emc-pstc that Andre, Pierre-Marie pierre-
marie.an...@intel.com wrote (in 9985493A802AD5118C4E0090274627535EC2EE
@swsmsx34.isw.intel.com) about 'Regulatory General Discussion : ouput
of Compliance group', on Mon, 17 Dec 2001:
The good argument is really in the FULL implication
Message-
From: Doug McKean [mailto:dmck...@auspex.com]
Sent: samedi 15 décembre 2001 01:26
To: EMC-PSTC Discussion Group
Subject: Re: Regulatory General Discussion : ouput of Compliance group
Andre, Pierre-Marie wrote:
So has anybody some thoughts or argument on the measurement
or evaluation
: Regulatory General Discussion : ouput of Compliance group
Andre, Pierre-Marie wrote:
So has anybody some thoughts or argument on the measurement
or evaluation of an Compliance Group ?
Well, I'd hate to let the dirty little secret out of the bag for those
of
us who would fall under
Andre, Pierre-Marie wrote:
So has anybody some thoughts or argument on the measurement
or evaluation of an Compliance Group ?
Well, I'd hate to let the dirty little secret out of the bag for those
of
us who would fall under such and evaluation. Important in such an
evaluation would be that
Hi there,
A few days ago there was some very interesting discussions about the
Compliance groups among companies.
A lot of ideas came out very clearly like do a company needs a centralized
regulatory group,how to fund it,how to explain our
regulatory tasks (quite complex !),how to structure it.
5 matches
Mail list logo
