uct conforms to all applicable EU
> directives/regulations.*
>
>
>
> So I guess e-labelling a product is not sufficient. Maybe there are other
> opinions…
>
>
>
> Greetings,
>
> Bart
>
>
>
> *From:* 06cee064502d-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ieee.or
elling a product is not sufficient. Maybe there are other
opinions…
Greetings,
Bart
From: 06cee064502d-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ieee.org
<06cee064502d-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ieee.org>
Sent: maandag april 2023 5:14
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: [PSES] e-Labeling
Hello group,
Hello group,
Does anyone know if EU accepts e-Labeling for IT products?
Thank youPeter
-
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail
C-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Sent: Wed, Apr 21, 2021 10:27 am
Subject: Re: [PSES] e-Labeling
#yiv9304360912 #yiv9304360912 -- _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered
{}#yiv9304360912 #yiv9304360912 p.yiv9304360912MsoNormal, #yiv9304360912
li.yiv9304360912MsoNormal, #yiv9304360912 div.yiv9304360912MsoNormal
{marg
, April 21, 2021 10:17 AM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: [PSES] e-Labeling
Hello group,
Do we know if EU accepts e-Labeling or not?
Thanks
Peter
-
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Soc
Hello group,
Do we know if EU accepts e-Labeling or not?
ThanksPeter
#yiv8202150213 -- filtered {panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}#yiv8202150213
filtered {font-family:Calibri;panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}#yiv8202150213
p.yiv8202150213MsoNormal, #yiv8202150213 li.yiv8202150213MsoNormal
Thank you,
Mark
From: Ben Kim [mailto:benki...@yahoo.com]
Sent: Friday, September 08, 2017 12:03 AM
To: Schmidt, Mark; EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] KC Mark E labeling
Hi Mark,
RRA notice 2015-26 and KATS announcement (date 4/26/2016) include this
information. Click
S site?
Regards,
Mark
From: Ben Kim [mailto:benki...@yahoo.com]
Sent: Thursday, September 07, 2017 1:42 PM
To: Schmidt, Mark; EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] KC Mark E labeling
Mark,
e-labelling is acceptable in S.Korea. Both RRA and KATS allows manufacture to
Thank you Ben,
Is there a link to this that is accessible? Is it on the RRA or KATS site?
Regards,
Mark
From: Ben Kim [mailto:benki...@yahoo.com]
Sent: Thursday, September 07, 2017 1:42 PM
To: Schmidt, Mark; EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] KC Mark E labeling
Mark,
e-labelling
te.com> wrote:
Hello
Group, Can anyone direct me to information concerning e labeling of a
Bluetooth module and Device. We are currently marking the FCC, IC and KC ID
physically on the product label but we ran out of room due to an OEM request on
one of our products. I understand that F
Hello Group,
Can anyone direct me to information concerning e labeling of a Bluetooth module
and Device. We are currently marking the FCC, IC and KC ID physically on the
product label but we ran out of room due to an OEM request on one of our
products. I understand that FCC and IC accept e
Group,
Thanks for the responses I got to my inquiry regarding 'e-labeling' - using
the product itself to display regulatory information. I got fewer responses
than I had hoped. One responder mentioned that as an OEM, he had a lot of
headaches from a large PC manufacturer who used an 'e-labeling
Hey Doug,
I guess it seems to me that if the device is non-functional, then none of
the regulatory information applies.
I see your point, but that's not how the lawyers think!
I was thinking about manufacturer ID's, certification file numbers or other
traceability-type markings such
; emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
Subject: Re: e-Labeling
Doug,
I think it's an interesting idea. Unfortunately, you have as many different
regulators to convince as you have labels.
As a former certifier, I have a few questions that I think would need to
be resolved. For example, if there were
Doug,
I think it's an interesting idea. Unfortunately, you have as many different
regulators to convince as you have labels.
As a former certifier, I have a few questions that I think would need to
be resolved. For example, if there were some question about the device that
an authority
]
Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2002 10:12 AM
To: IEEE - PSTC FORUM (E-mail)
Subject: e-Labeling
Hello Group;
Today's regulatory labeling requirements in a global marketplace can get
quite cumbersome, while devices such as handheld PDA-types tend to get
smaller, with fewer flat surfaces available
Hello Group;
Today's regulatory labeling requirements in a global marketplace can get
quite cumbersome, while devices such as handheld PDA-types tend to get
smaller, with fewer flat surfaces available for product labeling. One of my
company's objectives towards product labeling is that the
17 matches
Mail list logo
