This issue has been in effect since Jan. 1, 2010.
See: https://www.ftb.ca.gov/forms/2013/13_587.pdf
or: https://www.ftb.ca.gov/forms/2014/14_587.pdf
If you are a consultant (i.e. – Self Employed), the company you performed
the services for is required to send you a Form 1099-MISC if your
In message 007501cfc6f7$be0b7f40$3a227dc0$@cs.com, dated Tue, 2 Sep
2014, Pete Perkins 0061f3f32d0c-dmarc-requ...@ieee.org writes:
The cert lab enginer, however, wants full pedigree papers for
the
batteries
citing which clause of which standard?
- which the mfgr feels is not
Just for clarification, may I get concise answers to each of these questions?1) If a non-resident consultant travels to CA to do on-site work for a client company and this consultant is paid by the company at a later time at an hourly rate, which party is responsible for paying income taxes in
All,
I'm trying to do a transient emissions test using the ISO 7637-2 test
method(2004). I'm having trouble finding a switch or relay to do this. We have
some around the lab, but my test results seem to be just switch bounce or noise
- not much coming from the EUT.
Anyone have a suggestion
Welcome to the North American compliance landscape where the NRTL/SCC/NOM
process allows an agency to cite 'internal' policy and the assessment
engineer's 'judgment' in lieu of any other rationale. Not often, but it does
occur.
Brian
-Original Message-
From: John Woodgate
In message 1409759386.57661.yahoomail...@web126206.mail.ne1.yahoo.com,
dated Wed, 3 Sep 2014, David 00fdec74198b-dmarc-requ...@ieee.org
writes:
I'm trying to do a transient emissions test using the ISO 7637-2 test
method(2004). I'm having trouble finding a switch or relay to do this.
We
In message
b17a1c7235ca48aeb5ff6a4c66495...@blupr02mb116.namprd02.prod.outlook.com
, dated Wed, 3 Sep 2014, Brian Oconnell oconne...@tamuracorp.com
writes:
Welcome to the North American compliance landscape where the
NRTL/SCC/NOM process allows an agency to cite 'internal' policy and the
Was much legal wrangling in past decades where you could only go to FM or UL,
but the courts have, in fact, blessed most of the agency shenanigans, typically
due to component tracibility requirements per the OSHA NRTL and Canada SCC
Accreditation Services programs. There is no mutual
On 9/3/2014 11:31 AM, John Woodgate wrote:
In message
b17a1c7235ca48aeb5ff6a4c66495...@blupr02mb116.namprd02.prod.outlook.com
, dated Wed, 3 Sep 2014, Brian Oconnell oconne...@tamuracorp.com
writes:
Welcome to the North American compliance landscape where the
NRTL/SCC/NOM process allows an
But the NRTLs are accredited and regularly reviewed/inspected by their
accreditation bodies in order to stay on OSHAs NRTL list as I am repeatedly
reminded by the NRTLs otherwise their mark becomes worthless.
-Dave
-Original Message-
From: Richard Nute [mailto:ri...@ieee.org]
Sent:
On 9/3/2014 3:16 PM, Nyffenegger, Dave wrote:
But the NRTLs are accredited and regularly reviewed/inspected by their
accreditation bodies in order to stay on OSHAs NRTL list as I am repeatedly
reminded by the NRTLs otherwise their mark becomes worthless.
-Dave
Yes, but such reviews only
All of Mr Nute's comments are so very true. And there is another wrinkle - if
you build your box with a component certified by agency X and submit your box
to agency Y, you may have your construction rejected out of hand unless the
component maker agrees to resubmit to agency Y for
My consultant suggested a vertical SAR phantom, such as the one depicted on
page 3 at:
http://www.indexsar.com/pdf/SARAC-1108.pdf
Do any of the esteemed recipients of PSTC know of a test house that has one in
the United States, or something similar? Northern California, Bay Area, would
be
Folks,
EN 60204-1 states
6.4.1 General requirements
PELV circuits shall satisfy all of the following conditions:
a) the nominal voltage shall not exceed:
25 V a.c. r.m.s. or 60 V ripple-free d.c. when the equipment is normally used
in dry
locations and when large area contact of live parts
Quite interesting...
So, before the test, run your system calibration on a flat phantom and replace
the phantom with a head phantom for testing...
Hmm...I am not sure if FCC can give his blessing for this verification...
I wonder how do you replace the tissue also. I don't see a tap on the head
15 matches
Mail list logo