The Customs Union EAC mark, which came into effect two days ago, requires that
references to life time and storage time be placed in the manual.
Does anyone know of any guidance or examples of what is considered to be
sufficient?
thanks
Mike Sherman
Product Safety and Compliance Engineer
In message
bn3pr0801mb097985bfe1773ece195b9c5285...@bn3pr0801mb0979.namprd08.prod.o
utlook.com, dated Tue, 17 Mar 2015, Nyffenegger, Dave
dave.nyffeneg...@bhemail.com writes:
Annex VII states the technical file shall include ?a copy of the EC
declaration of conformity;? Don?t know if this
In message 20150317.133927.1501...@webmail08.vgs.untd.com, dated Tue,
17 Mar 2015, Brian Gregory brian_greg...@netzero.net writes:
I would not use either S/N or model numbers.
Some EU Directives require each unit to be positively identifiable, for
recall if necessary. I don't see how to do
John Allen's approach and advice is reasonable.
Some our more experienced denizens such as Rich Nute and Pete Perkins and have
written some articles on safety engineering principles for the PSES newsletter.
Ted Eckert did a session on compliance and regulatory sources at a recent
ISPCE. Cannot
Adam
I’m not sure that reading and trying to understand the standards themselves in
detail is the best first step in understanding the design issues because most
standards are written mainly for test and certification organisations, rather
than design engineers – and the latter often have a
Hi Adam:
Since you are a member of IEEE, you can access all the “Product Safety
Newsletters” and “Product Safety Engineering Newsletters” on the PSES web site.
Most of these are chock-full of good safety engineering stuff.
Also, consider attending the three-day ISPCE Symposium
A sincere thanks to all who responded to my educational query.
@John A. - thanks for the detailed guidance perspective. I'll take a
look for the sources while making an attempt at the one-by-one delving
that you recommend. I have bookmarked the IECEE site and will take a
closer look.
@Dan R.
Brian --
I agree with your comments as they apply to one's technical file.
I resist adding unnecessarily detailed information to the DoC.
Mike Sherman
Graco Inc.
- Original Message -
From: Brian Gregory brian_greg...@netzero.net
To: EMC-PSTC EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Sent:
Advice from one with mostly US experience, but with an NRTL/NB: Until
otherwise prohibited by MD, best practices are: - use of company issued
documentation to properly describe the products covered by a DoC. Types,
application and ratings need to be crystal clear in the documentation. Use
Did not that ISO stuff was required. What is basis for requirement to indicate
accreditations/certifications on the machinery directive D of C?
Another member of the esteemed Brian Club.
Brian
From: Brian Gregory [mailto:brian_greg...@netzero.net]
Sent: Tuesday, March 17, 2015 12:39 PM
To:
Hi all,
We are in the market for a second hand screened room in the UK.
If anyone knows of any being sold please could they get in touch?
Many thanks,
James Pawson
Leading EMC Engineer
EchoStar
-
This message is from the IEEE
This is true, however, we cannot wait until the twelfth hour and then find out
about these things. High Res color photos and printers and the processes to
integrate this into production is not a couple hour job. Especially for those
who also have to comply with the Machinery Directive where
John,
Thanks for pointing that out. I didn't notice the MAY. I'll have to make a
point to do that in the future.
However, with my luck, I'm sure some country will translate this into a Must
Have requirement in their law.
As you may know from other treads I've been participating in that we
13 matches
Mail list logo
