Hello David,
I believe this document explains it:
https://boss.cenelec.eu/media/4dij213u/en_iecreferencing.pdf
Cheers,
Dean
Dean Jurgensen
Compliance, Senior Test Campaign Leader | NCE
Xantrex Business
Mission Critical Electronics
P Please consider our environment before printing!
T:
Hello David,
amendment A1:2020 is the adoption of CISPR 32:2015/A1:2019 by CENELEC (without
any modification), while amendment A11:2020 adds the European Foreword and
Annex ZZ "Relationship between this European standard and the essential
requirements of Directive 2014/30/EU [2014 OJ L96]
David
I'm not speaking from experience, as I don't work with this standard, but the
free preview shows that A1 replaces A11 and has a summary of the history of
changes
https://shop.bsigroup.com/products/electromagnetic-compatibility-of-multimedia-equipment-emission-requirements-3/preview
Hello
I have seen EN 55032-2015 listed with either A1-2020 or A11-2020.
Is there any difference between them or is it just a typo?
Best Regards,
David Shidlowsky
Technical Reviewer
[cid:image001.jpg@01D7CB27.5BC81000]
Address 1 Bat-Sheva St. POB 6117, LOD7120101 Israel
Tel: 972-8-9186100 Ext.
Hi members
Can anyone offer some advice.
Have issues with EMC Chamber RF Filter 3 phase.
Using 115V 400Hz single phase supply from a static convertor, filter looks like
it is saturating.
Ambient levels failing between 6kHz to 150kHz.
Voltage of phase at static convertor 115.8Vrms but at EUT on
The filter is probably designed for 50Hz or 60 Hz mains. It probably
isn't saturating at a higher input frequency, but your voltage
measurements indicate that it may be resonating. I think you need a
filter specifically designed for 400 Hz mains.
Another possibility is adjusting power factor to account for the filter
effect. This is a common effect and a chamber outfitted with such filters
often has remotely-controlled power factor correction. A long time ago,
when chamber EMI filters cut in at 150 kHz instead of 10 kHz, the impact
wasn¹t
7 matches
Mail list logo
