In my view, the Risk Assessment should never be treated as a 'get out of
jail' card or panacea. Instead, it is only a starting point for a safe
design and should be done near the beginning of a project, not the end. I
agree with what Rich says, I've seen a lot of subjective assessments by
Hi Charlie,
It is pity. The risk assessment may have variants and inconsistence amongst
test engineers and make the compliance more difficult.
Regards,
Scott
From: Charlie Blackham
Sent: Friday, 11 February 2022 6:10 pm
To: scott...@gmail.com; EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Dear Group,
I am afraid the answer to my question may rely on purchasing 'before and after'
standards and sifting out the delta in order to prepare a Gap Report to a
Declaration of Conformity.
* If there is an alternate method please advise. A recommended service
perhaps. Decoder Ring?
At
I would say “…risk assessment WILL have variants…”
The risk assessment process is subjective. If you perform a risk assessment on
an ordinary extension cord, you can find that it is marginally safe.
Rich
From: scott...@gmail.com
Sent: Friday, February 11, 2022 9:14 AM
To:
Scott
There’s no better system on the way – we’re stuck with the current one!
As always, Harmonised Standards provide a “presumption of conformity”, but
manufacturers must also document a risk assessment and determine whether the
applied standard covers all foreseeable risks, and if not, what
5 matches
Mail list logo
