Re: [PSES] Retest because of supersded standard?

2013-08-31 Thread ce-test, qualified testing bv - Gert Gremmen
John Wrote: The EMC Directive doesn't demand ANY testing. Maybe, but it demands EVIDENCE of compliance. Annex IV - 1 Two Definitons of Evidence Law: The documentary or oral statements and the material objects admissible as testimony in a court of law. Law: information drawn from

Re: [PSES] Retest because of supersded standard?

2013-08-31 Thread John Woodgate
In message FCA549BE3ECF9D4CB8CB8576837EA48920A173@ZEUS.cetest.local, dated Sat, 31 Aug 2013, ce-test, qualified testing bv - Gert Gremmen g.grem...@cetest.nl writes: John Wrote:   The EMC Directive doesn't demand ANY testing.   Maybe, but it demands EVIDENCE of compliance. Annex IV - 1

Re: [PSES] Retest because of supersded standard?

2013-08-31 Thread ce-test, qualified testing bv - Gert Gremmen
We cannot read anything but evidence here, there is no but : if one applies harmonized standards, you need evidence, and that is the case in this discussion. Within the chapter of technical documentation, that means written evidence , not a witness :) If you have evidence about

Re: [PSES] Retest because of supersded standard?

2013-08-31 Thread John Woodgate
In message FCA549BE3ECF9D4CB8CB8576837EA48920A174@ZEUS.cetest.local, dated Sat, 31 Aug 2013, ce-test, qualified testing bv - Gert Gremmen g.grem...@cetest.nl writes: Are you still sure about your new Signature ?? Yes. But I'm now not sure of the point you are making. There is nothing in my

Re: [PSES] 3rd party labs due-diligence

2013-08-31 Thread Bayo Olabisi
To add to previous comments, reviews on various labs could serve as voice of customer feedback mechanism to manufacturers seeking to know more about labs - we've started to do that recently. Having done testing at multiple labs, the experience isn't the same, and being accredited doesn't mean