Thanks! What is the major impact on own brand labelers?
Regards,
Scott
On 6/6/14 5:53 am, T.Sato vef00...@nifty.ne.jp wrote:
On Fri, 6 Jun 2014 00:49:58 +0800,
Scott Xe scott...@gmail.com wrote:
Is there any reason behind to have LVD, EMC and RTTE directives updated in
similar time?
Yes, we need to study the new RED and its impact.
Thanks and regards,
Scott
On 6/6/14 1:27 am, John Woodgate j...@jmwa.demon.co.uk wrote:
In message cfb6c0b6.1eed7%scott...@gmail.com, dated Fri, 6 Jun 2014,
Scott Xe scott...@gmail.com writes:
Is there any reason behind to have LVD, EMC
In message cfb7fd26.1eefe%scott...@gmail.com, dated Fri, 6 Jun 2014,
Scott Xe scott...@gmail.com writes:
Thanks! What is the major impact on own brand labelers?
Either the original manufacturer's name and address must be on the
product label or the own-brand company has to accept the full
Hi!
For EN55032:2012, stand alone monitors must be emissions tested with a
standard television colour bar signal according to ITU-R BT 1729 with
an additional small moving element. This signal is defined in ITU-R
BT.1729
Mr. Tom Sato has some of the bouncing ball stuff source published on his web
site.
And have seen other sites with 1729 stuff.
Brian
From: monrad monsen [mailto:monrad.mon...@oracle.com]
Sent: Friday, June 06, 2014 10:33 AM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: [PSES] EN55032 and the
Hi Tom,
I just found your posting of the ITU-R BT.1729 colour bar test pattern.
This is great!
Does this fully implement the ITU-R BT.1729 colour bar test pattern?
** BOUNCING BALL: I couldn't find anything in the standard that
mentions a bouncing ball, but I like the feature and one could
Here is the link to Tom Sato's site.
http://homepage3.nifty.com/tsato/scrolling-h/colorbar.html
This email message and attachments may contain confidential and proprietary
information. Any unauthorized use is prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender by
CISPR 32 requires the color bars with a moving element. What that moving
element is isn't nailed down in the standard. The reason for the moving
element is that we (CISPR SC I) are trying to harmonize CISPR 32 (emissions)
and CISPR 35 (immunity) to the maximum extent possible. You need a
On Fri, 06 Jun 2014 23:20:06 +0800,
Scott Xe scott...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks! What is the major impact on own brand labelers?
NLF directives such as 2014/30/EU defines manufacturer as
any natural or legal person who manufactures apparatus or
**has apparatus designed or manufactured, and
On Fri, 6 Jun 2014 13:03:18 -0600,
monrad monsen monrad.mon...@oracle.com wrote:
I just found your posting of the ITU-R BT.1729 colour bar test
pattern. This is great!
Does this fully implement the ITU-R BT.1729 colour bar test pattern?
No, as I wrote These colorbars (test patterns) were
Hi All,
I just reviewed Keith Armstrong's wonderfully practical book, EMC Design
Techniques for Electronic Engineers. While light on really deep theory, he
provides just the right amount for good understanding sufficient to understand
how to design products for EMC compliance. Highly
PSNEtters,
Solid insulation requirements are not new; IEC 60664, among other
standards, has dealt with this for some time.
IEC 61010 (and its variants) have introduced solid insulation
requirements in the 3rd Ed of the standard.
Has this change resulted in published
Mr. Perkins,
Am not certain if you are looking for stuff to support standards development,
or theoretical stuff to support a paper. But here is what this little redneck
mind is aware of:
http://www.usbr.gov/power/data/fist/fist3_1/vol3-1.pdf (the original was useful
when started on MV and HV
The NLF requires the importer and/or manufacturer name and address on the
product. It is effective for the market surveillance to track the
responsible party rather than previous trade name/mark that must be
registered in EU. In terms of responsibility, the local importer still
holds the legal
14 matches
Mail list logo
