Scott,
TUV have this free Webinar, it might be useful.
http://www.tuv-sud.co.uk/uk-en/resource-centre/webinars/webinar-downloads
I cant comment because I havent watched it yet, but I will do. Let me know if its a must see.
Regards,
Tony
Sent:Friday, June 06, 2014 at 4:20 PM
Hi Scott,
I think that two important points to consider for anyone re-branding a
product is this:
The new Radio Equipment Directive states:
The manufacturer, having detailed knowledge of the design and production
process, is best placed to carry out the conformity assessment procedure.
In message 20af01cf83c0$8988ff10$9c9afd30$@acbcert.com, dated Mon, 9
Jun 2014, Michael Derby micha...@acbcert.com writes:
When deemed appropriate with regard to the risks presented by radio
equipment, importers shall, to protect the health and safety of
end-users,
So the RED, unlike the
Hello,
Yes, the RED is just like the RTTED in that sense.
Presently: If a device has a radio in it (such as a laptop with WiFi, or
other digital device with Bluetooth, etc.), then the RTTE Directive applies
to that device. The RTTE Directive includes EMC and Safety, so the EMC
and Safety
OJ for RED?
11:59pm on 11th June 2016 ?
J
Michael Derby
Regulatory Engineer
ACB Europe
From: Charlie Blackham [mailto:char...@sulisconsultants.com]
Sent: 08 June 2014 20:32
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] List of Harmonised standards for RED
David
In message 20f901cf83c7$bc77eba0$3567c2e0$@acbcert.com, dated Mon, 9
Jun 2014, Michael Derby micha...@acbcert.com writes:
11:59pm on 11th June 2016 ?
23:59:59 UTC-12.
--
OOO - Own Opinions Only. With best wishes. See www.jmwa.demon.co.uk
Quid faciamus nisi sit?
John Woodgate, J M Woodgate
Hi Tony,
Thanks for useful info. Highly recommended!
Noticeable changes are that all radio receivers including broadcast radio
and TV receivers now fall into RED. TTE is now within the scope of the EMC
Directive and LVD. The safety requirements set out in LVD with no voltage
limit
John,
There's a chance that I will direct WG4 to resolve the national committee
comments on the FDIS and go with a CDV, skipping the CD stage. But, you are
correct in that there is not enough time left in the project to go the CDV/FDIS
route, so an NP will be required. But, for CENELEC to
In message
63e38a5b081437478c77651f3d56c64f58052...@orsmsx102.amr.corp.intel.com,
dated Mon, 9 Jun 2014, Pettit, Ghery ghery.pet...@intel.com writes:
There's a chance that I will direct WG4 to resolve the national
committee comments on the FDIS and go with a CDV, skipping the CD
stage.
I
Some confusion with the way I worded my sentence. By I I meant SC I, not me
personally. Exactly how this is handled with be up to SC I in its next
meeting, scheduled for 20 October in Frankfurt.
Ghery S. Pettit
-Original Message-
From: John Woodgate [mailto:j...@jmwa.demon.co.uk]
In message
63e38a5b081437478c77651f3d56c64f58052...@orsmsx102.amr.corp.intel.com,
dated Mon, 9 Jun 2014, Pettit, Ghery ghery.pet...@intel.com writes:
Some confusion with the way I worded my sentence. By I I meant SC I,
not me personally. Exactly how this is handled with be up to SC I in
You make an excellent point. Please forward your suggestion to Martin Wright
as he is the Chairman of SC I.
Ghery S. Pettit
-Original Message-
From: John Woodgate [mailto:j...@jmwa.demon.co.uk]
Sent: Monday, June 09, 2014 9:29 AM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES]
After U.S. Treasury Department issued General License No. 18, my employer has
investigated the re-start of Myanmar factory.
Have received different stories from various NRTLs and other Notified and
various assessment bodies. Some have interpreted U.S. policy to indicate ok to
send people to
Hi!
Unfortunately, Tom Sato's software does not fully comply with ITU-R
BT.1729. The big discrepancy is listed below:
** ZONE 12 MOVING BAR: Page 6 of the standard states that Zone 12
contains a bar which moves horizontally from left to right and then
starts again from the left. This is
Here we go again. On and off over the last 30 years I have bumped heads over
having English Text on warning labels on Worldwide marketed products shipped to
non-English speaking countries. I was given the impression that Europe was ok
with English Text as long as it was explained in the
In message
64D32EE8B9CBDD44963ACB076A5F6ABB0269B066@Mailbox-Tech.lecotech.local,
dated Mon, 9 Jun 2014, Kunde, Brian brian_ku...@lecotc.com writes:
Here we go again. On and off over the last 30 years I have bumped heads
over having English Text on warning labels on Worldwide marketed
Brian,
In this instance, the lab is correct. You’ve only partially quoted EHSR 1.7.1;
in full it reads:
Information and warnings on the machinery
Information and warnings on the machinery should preferably be provided in the
form of readily understandable symbols or pictograms. Any written or
Would you interpret the requirements of section 1.7.1 to only apply to
information pertaining to a warning? For instance, does the FCC Statement
have to be translated when it does not pertain in Europe?
How about English Text near a switch that says, Main? Is it good enough to
show in the
In message
64D32EE8B9CBDD44963ACB076A5F6ABB0269B12B@Mailbox-Tech.lecotech.local,
dated Mon, 9 Jun 2014, Kunde, Brian brian_ku...@lecotc.com writes:
This has been a battle that has been going on for a long time. I wish
we could come to some understanding.
France is a special case. The
19 matches
Mail list logo
