Re: [PSES] Protective bonding point identification

2014-08-26 Thread John Woodgate
In message 53fb9f44.4020...@ieee.org, dated Mon, 25 Aug 2014, Richard Nute ri...@ieee.org writes: The peripheral should have a PE terminal that is marked with IEC 5019. It can be plugged into a mains outlet or a host equipment with a convenience outlet. (Or a multiple outlet strip.)

Re: [PSES] Protective bonding point identification

2014-08-26 Thread Kunde, Brian
This supposed contradiction was the purpose for my original question. We currently mark our products PE terminals as Richard Nute explained so well. But as John has pointed out the 5019 definition including the term external has brought what we do in question. For now I think it best for us to

[PSES] Crossed-out wheeled bin symbol

2014-08-26 Thread Scott Xe
In WEEE Directive, it requires crossed-out wheeled bin symbol according to EN 50419 : 2006 on the product. This symbol looks very similar to the one required in Battery Directive 2006/66/EC. Unfortunately the battery directive does not provide the applicable standard so it is unsure if they

Re: [PSES] Crossed-out wheeled bin symbol

2014-08-26 Thread John Woodgate
In message c67fe116-899f-4893-85a8-74a7658cf...@gmail.com, dated Wed, 27 Aug 2014, Scott Xe scott...@gmail.com writes: In WEEE Directive, it requires crossed-out wheeled bin symbol according to EN 50419 : 2006 on the product. This symbol looks very similar to the one required in Battery

[PSES] construction machinery in USA

2014-08-26 Thread T.Sato
Dear experts, In USA, are there any regulatory EMC requirements for construction machinery (heavy machinery in general) such as crane, backhoe, etc.? For FCC, 47 CFR 15.103(a) says that digital devices utilized exclusively in transportation vehicle are exempted, but FCC OET says The exemption

Re: [PSES] construction machinery in USA

2014-08-26 Thread Ted Eckert
The FCC is generally not concerned with unintentional emissions from construction machinery. The general assumption is that a susceptible receiver would not be operating in close proximity to the construction equipment. It may no longer be a correct assumption, but that is the basis. It will

Re: [PSES] construction machinery in USA

2014-08-26 Thread Nyffenegger, Dave
Our large mail and parcels processing equipment doesn't fit in any chamber either, and it doesn't have wheels. Just have to do it the old fashioned way and bring the portable equipment to the Cat. At least it can be driven to an open field for evaluation. -Dave From: Ted Eckert

Re: [PSES] construction machinery in USA

2014-08-26 Thread John Woodgate
In message 510d85f1c3014e06aded907581717...@bl2pr03mb372.namprd03.prod.outlook.com , dated Wed, 27 Aug 2014, Ted Eckert ted.eck...@microsoft.com writes: (I would also like to know how you would run testing on a Caterpillar 797. I don?t think it would fit in many chambers.) Indeed, but there