There is a general misconception that only the highest clock rate determines
the frequency range of test. The definitions in the standards are not specific
to clock frequencies, but rather to the frequencies generated or used.
FCC: "Highest frequency generated or used in the device or on which
Highest clock! not data rate.
Rodney Davis
From: Robert Dunkerley
Sent: Friday, January 29, 2016 8:56 AM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] Highest clock frequency in a device.
How would you treat a piece of IT
I posed that question to the FCC many years ago and got the answer that the
transmitter operating frequency now becomes a frequency of the host device.
Therefore a device that operates at, say 50 mHz but has a Wi-Fi transmitter
installed shall be tested to the frequency specified in 15.33
How would you treat a piece of IT equipment that had say a 10Gbit/s Ethernet
port? Do you just treat this as 10GHz, and use that as the highest clock?
Rob.
-Original Message-
From: Bill Stumpf [mailto:bstu...@dlsemc.com]
Sent: 29 January 2016 13:48
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
On 1/28/2016 2:42 PM, Chuck McDowell wrote:
To quote from BS EN 55032:2012 with 2014 update
3.1.19
highest internal frequency
Fx
highest fundamental frequency generated or used within the EUT or
highest frequency at which it operates
NOTE This includes frequencies which are solely used
> Hmm. An on-board WiFi device "uses" (non-clock) GHz range frequencies
-- internally.
That would be an intentional transmitter though and covered by different FCC
rule part / EU standards
Charlie
-Original Message-
From: Cortland Richmond [mailto:k...@earthlink.net]
Sent: 29 January
Group,
My customer builds vehicular laptop and tablet docking stations intended
for hard mounted use within emergency vehicles such as police and
ambulance, as well as work trucks and forklifts. The vehicular power
supply narrowly missed CISPR 22 radiated Class B limits. Then their AU
These vehicles travel between residential and commercial zones on a regular
basis, so on that alone I would agree with the class B assessment, but I'm
wondering if you don't have lots of other EMC issues to deal with - automotive
immunity etc.
The only time I've personally seen an exemption
Correct - CISPR22 not scoped for automotive end-use installation. And there is
additional stuff for ambulance (60601-1-2), where there are additional immunity
and emissions requirements. Also, class A stuff will probably degrade P25 and
TETRA radio systems.
Methinks mundane ACMA requirements
Gary,
With regard to auto EMC compliance, that is taken care of already. This
hardware is being subjected to AU/NZS CISPR 22 simply to satisfy AU ACMA
requirements. I appreciate your comments concerning the residential zone,
but I don't agree that simply because a vehicle may travel
Brian,
I disagree that the fact that this device is an automotive device excludes
it from the scope of CISPR 22. ITE is defined primarily by the
functionality of the device (displays, stores, communicates, etc).
ACMA doesn't exclude vehicles from the requlations. If vehicle accessory
Looking at the radiated emission requirements on things that are part of the
vehicle, they are much more severe than Class B. And the
ambulance/emergency vehicle will be using more of the rf spectrum than the
typical ground vehicle, and such use is not entertainment or even
navigation, but may be
Wow how we easily get off topic.
What about the simple definition
Class A
Such equipment should not be
restricted in its sale but the following warning shall be included in
the instructions for use:
Even the authorities indicated Class A in an option but SUGGESTED class B.
Good luck... not
Mr. Newton asked for opinions, so for what it's worth, here is mine. I hope
you will all excuse my rant. Many will interpret the "exclusions" based on
their viewpoint. Not being associated with a manufacturer, my interpretation
may be different than others. The FCC excludes devices used
The FCC also exempts a digital device utilized exclusively in an appliance,
e.g., microwave oven, dishwasher, clothes dryer, air conditioner (central or
window), from the its Part 15 technical requirements, so being rational
doesn't always make sense.
Jim Hulbert
-Original Message-
Ken,
Note that the device has tested per EN 50498 for vehicular EMC
compatibility by an accredited auto lab and complies with broadband and
narrowband emissions requirements within. I believe that standard is
taking mobile communications into account. Also, note that the OP states
that
Not to pile on but our EMC lab has performed testing on a lot of equipment used
in an Ambulance and it is always Class B. The reason I was told was because
ambulances can go into Residential Areas.
We have also tested DC Outboard Trolling Motors for boats which are also class
B because
And, for another perspective, UNECE Regulation 10, "Uniform provisions
concerning the approval of vehicles with regard to electromagnetic
compatibility", restricts 10m radiated emissions to limits which lie
between CISPR Class A and Class B.
Ralph McDiarmid
Compliance Engineering
18 matches
Mail list logo