Re: [PSES] TRF Verdicts

FWIW, I was always deeply skeptical of the “(Pass, Fail, N/A)” criteria in the TRF’s because those were, and generally still are, almost totally dependent on “the eye of the beholder”, i.e. whoever does the compliance assessment! We use the terms risk, risk assessment, hazard, and safety

[PSES] EMC lab manager opportunity

Greetings, Please feel free to contact me if you have some questions before or after applying. The position reports to a director. It's job code 180018X on our careers page. Best regards, Doug Kealey Regulatory and Environmental Affairs Manager Garmin

Re: [PSES] TRF Verdicts

FWIW, I was always deeply skeptical of the “(Pass, Fail, N/A)” criteria in the TRF’s because those were, and generally still are, almost totally dependent on “the eye of the beholder”, i.e. whoever does the compliance assessment! An (absolutely terrible!) example of that was what I found (in a

Re: [PSES] TRF Verdicts

You appear to have uncovered a significantly unsatisfactory situation, where essential terminology is lacking formal definitions.  TRFs are the responsibility of a branch of IEC, called IECEE (https://www.iecee.org/). I think that representations have to be made to IECEE to remedy this

Re: [PSES] TRF Verdicts

I downloaded and searched for this terminology in all the OD documents available as well as "AD" documents, including all past revisions I could locate. Some 300+ documents. To set the stage, I always think of type testing as being an exercise in "cause and effect". That is, some defect (cause)