Hi Everyone,This is my first time regarding prototype/proof of concept
products, is it subjected to the same safety and emc guidelines?
--
Thank you and best regards.
- Frank
-
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineerin
Joe,
I think that you are referring to the SawStop invented by Steve Glass.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dekzPA6nhC4
shows it in action.
John Barnes KS4GL, PE, NCE, NCT, ESDC Eng, ESDC Tech, PSE, Master EMC
Design Eng, SM IEEE (retired)
216 Hillsboro Ave
Lexington, KY 40511-2105
(859)
Ah, the other skin effect. ;-)
Not exactly what is sought, but maybe there is useful information in the realm
of BIA research such as this papers like this (?) (apologies for the long link
copied from iPad browsing..):
https://watermark.silverchair.com/388s.pdf?token=AQECAHi208BE49Ooan9kkhW_Er
Is it not possible to refer such a divergence to TC108 for a ruling on
interpretation? Maybe even an Interpretation Sheet would be generated if
the 'ES2' test house has misunderstood the standard.
Best wishes
John Woodgate OOO-Own Opinions Only
J M Woodgate and Associates www.woodjohn.uk
Raylei
Hi Boštjan:
If you say ES1 and another certification body says ES2, then a negotiation must
take place.
To avoid negotiation, you must change your verdict to ES2.
However, the manufacturer wants ES1, which is determined by the voltage. I
agree that the voltage waveform is ES1
I don't know of any that Pete Perkins wouldn't know about.
Best wishes
John Woodgate OOO-Own Opinions Only
J M Woodgate and Associates www.woodjohn.uk
Rayleigh, Essex UK
On 2019-03-13 19:06, Richard Nute wrote:
John referenced “skin resistance.”
To my knowledge, there is no research that show
John referenced “skin resistance.”
To my knowledge, there is no research that shows skin resistance and body
resistance as separate parameters. We only know total body resistance, and
that it is a variable that changes – lowers -- with applied voltage and time.
Having said that, a goo
7 matches
Mail list logo
