Re: [PSES] EMC and safety basics (process documentation)

Frank,Getting started in this is a lot of work. For a product such as yours the requirements are similar but not the same for each market. The work starts with an understanding of the technical requirements that need to be applied to the product in the development phase which will be

Re: [PSES] EMC and safety basics (process documentation)

Hi Dave,Thank you for your response. Product is light industrial laboratory equipment and market is US, europe, asia, korea. Trying to figure out which entities I contact for CoC, CE Mark, etc. Tried searching online for a good sources to use as information I can feed back to team,  but havent

Re: [PSES] RoHS 3 question

An approach I’ve also seen is “2011/65/EU as amended”. If you go for the longer version, I think the proper title of that directive is “COMMISSION DELEGATED DIRECTIVE (EU) 2015/863” where the EU appears in prefix. -L From: Michael Cantwell Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2019 2:18 PM To:

Re: [PSES] RoHS 3 question

2015/863 is “only” a “Commission Delegated Directive” which amends Annex II of 2011/65/EU 2011/65/EU is the applicable CE marking Directive and that is the only one for RoHS that should be on a DoC (see http://ec.europa.eu/environment/waste/rohs_eee/legis_en.htm ) Regards Charlie Charlie

Re: [PSES] RoHS 3 question

Commission-delegated Directives, don't have /EU at the end. 2015/863 is an amendment to 2011/65/EU, not a 'new version'. Best wishes John Woodgate OOO-Own Opinions Only J M Woodgate and Associates www.woodjohn.uk Rayleigh, Essex UK The UK is a sovereign state, not a Zollverein state On

Re: [PSES] RoHS 3 question

The proper way to cite this would be: " Compliant to 2011/65/EU as modified by 2015/863". There is no "/EU" at the end. On Thu, May 9, 2019 at 1:48 PM John Woodgate wrote: > You normally only cite the latest version. As far as I know, all these > references end in /EU now. > > Best wishes >

Re: [PSES] RoHS 3 question

You normally only cite the latest version. As far as I know, all these references end in /EU now. Best wishes John Woodgate OOO-Own Opinions Only J M Woodgate and Associates www.woodjohn.uk Rayleigh, Essex UK The UK is a sovereign state, not a Zollverein state On 2019-05-09 19:12,

[PSES] RoHS 3 question

Hello group, Our products complies with all versions of RoHS including the latest one. When it comes to creating Declarations of conformity, do I write (RoHS) 2011/65/EU+ 2015/863 or do I just write 2015/863? Is there an EU at the end of the 863? ThanksPeter -

Re: [PSES] EMC and safety basics (process documentation)

These are very big questions. Your employer should arrange for you to attend appropriate training courses. Best wishes John Woodgate OOO-Own Opinions Only J M Woodgate and Associates www.woodjohn.uk Rayleigh, Essex UK The UK is a sovereign state, not a Zollverein state On 2019-05-09 17:53,

Re: [PSES] EMC and safety basics (process documentation)

Frank, Answer to many these questions depend on what market(s) you are selling into. Your test lab will provide you with their prerequisites needed for a given test/certification. These should be identified in their quotes. Generally minimum requirements for safety evaluation/certifications

[PSES] EMC and safety basics (process documentation)

Hi Everyone,Looking for some guidance and mentoring because I am currently in charge of compliance and regulatory division on my own.Any knowledge provided will be greatly appreciated.Have some knowledge on process for EMC testing, but need guidance for, - What to do after test complete

Re: [PSES] Class 1 Div 2 in a pressurized enclosure requires NTRL?

There are several references in the OSHA regulations where “approved” is mentioned. “Approved is then defined in 29 CFR 1910.399 which is where the NRTL certification requirement is listed. Kevin. Kevin From: Rodriguez, Daniel (ESP) Sent: Thursday, May 9,

Re: [PSES] Class 1 Div 2 in a pressurized enclosure requires NTRL?

Thank you Robison for your reply!! Then the summary is that a industrial controller to be used in Class 1 Div 2 needs to have NTRL approval for Hazloc and ordinary location. A self certification by the manufacturer for Hazloc is not accepted. Which point of the regulation indicates it?