Hi Joe,
Product liability, h.. Actually I much prefer staying on the other
side of the fence making sure that that products are safe to start with.
However, I know that alone that will not prevent occasionally embarking
into the liability arena (I liken it to a viper pit). Its a place
Hello all,
Personally, I thought the Y3.doc was fairly clever, even making it
non-readable. Maybe the meeting place is encrypted or coded into the
document?
Anyway, in waxing nostalgic, I wonder how many of us recall the CPS unit.
:-)
Best regards,
Ron Pickard
rpick...@hypercom.com
Hi Chaz,
I'm sure the folks in Japan would certainly think it to be reasonable.
Power there is supplied at 100V 50Hz 100V 60Hz depending where in Japan
you happen to be. Common input test conditions at 100V 50Hz line voltage
would be +6% (106V 53Hz) and -10% (90V 47Hz). As you can see, very
Hello out there,
I have some questions regarding the adoption if IEC60950 3rd Edition.
1) Now that IEC60950 3rd Ed. is now out and UL60950 3rd Ed. is out for
review, when will EN60950 catch up and follow IEC60950 3rd Ed.?
2) And for that matter, how about AS/NZ 3260 and other 950 derivatives?
Hi Joe,
According to ISO7000, symbol 0659's description is Biological risks.
I hope this helps.
Best regards,
Ron Pickard
rpick...@hypercom.com
MartinJP@pebi
Ron,
Wandel Golterman does. I know they're pricey like lots of low volume test
gear They've been bought by somebody, but I suspect that their web page is
still findable. I don't know model numbers or contact info.
Dick Shultz
--
From: Ron Pickard/Hypercom/US
Reply To: Ron
Hello to all,
This is focused to the knowledgeable folks in Canada and to others that
might know the answer(s) to this query.
In the USA, there exists the federal approval/listing requirements found in
29CFR Part 1910 Subpart S.
Does anyone know if there is a similar set of rules requiring
To: 'Ron
Pickard/Hypercom/US' rpick...@hypercom.com,
ostar.com emc-p...@ieee.org,
t...@world.std.com
cc
To all that might be aware of this subject again,
Is anyone aware of an effort for EN60950 going to 3rd Edition? And, when
will the CB Scheme adopt IEC60950 3rd Edition? Is effectivity very soon,
soon, not at all, never? Surely, someone must know something about these
developments.
Thank you
Not at all. Those qualifications would be found in Annex MT. ;-)
Best regards,
Ron Pickard
rpick...@hypercom.com
Aimee.L.Davis
Hi Dave,
You might want to try contacting the Trinidad and Tobago Bureau of
Standards below:
P.O Box 467
Port of Spain
Lot 1 Century Drive, Trincity Industrial Estate
Macoya, Tunapuna
Trinidad and Tobago
868 662 8827 / 868 662 4241/4242; fax: 868 663 4335
www.opus.co.tt/ttbs
I'm fairly sure
Hi Peter,
Hmmm... Let me see, keeping everything to 4 or 5 decimal places,
1m = 3.2808 ft, therefore, 1m3 = 35.3145 ft3, and therefore,
1m3/hr = 0.58857 ft3/min (CFM)
An old physics professor I knew years back said, that for solving any
equation, if you keep the units straight the numbers
To all,
The following newsletter may be of interest to many of you. It covers the
compliance arena quite well with good articles and up-to-date information.
For further details, go to the link below.
Please note that CCL and I have no professional affiliation and this is not
a commercial
13 matches
Mail list logo
