Can you sell CEE 7/4 outlet in France?
-
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to
they not be tested separately or just hope they get
addressed during the sweep?
Any opinions on test methodologies, besides traditional sweep are welcome.
Thanks,
Mark Gandler
Netgear
-
This message
Group,
trying to get to the bottom of the statement some of you saw many times over.
Test is a power line surge, section 4.2.4 of TIA-968-A. This is a quote:
Failure Modes resulting from application of power line surge. Approved terminal
equipment and approved protective circuitry shall
but it cannot take the
network with it. After the failure mode the applicable tests are repeated to
make sure you product does not harm the network even if your product no longer
operates.
Dan
From: Mark Gandler [mailto:markgand...@hotmail.com]
Sent: Friday, February 10, 2012 12:48 PM
To: EMC-PSTC
to the front
desk does the trick.
Mark Gandler
Netgear
-
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e
James,there were a lot of good suggestions on how to utilize what you have
(Product Documentation Management SW, like Agile) or any other hands-on
resource. I have actually came across a company specializing in providing
engineering services, and one of them is Compliance Management SW. Its
Bill,being struggling with the same question. 1.8.1 goes in effect only on
1.1.2015, but current 1.7.1 should be used with an adaptivity requirement from
1.8.1.It is very unusual circumstances where the requirement is pretty much
dropped out of nowhere and looks like goes in effect
Bill,if it would be only logical assessment, then yes, you are correct. But the
writers of the aforementioned Note had a different idea and according to their
interpretation in order to prove compliance with 1.8.1 you MUST test. Previous
1.7.1 did not address this and Medium Access Protocol
requirements
In message snt108-w48a92b45f82f55a03910b9ad...@phx.gbl, dated Mon, 26 Nov
2012, Mark Gandler markgand...@hotmail.com
writes:
Bill,being struggling with the same question. 1.8.1 goes in effect only
on 1.1.2015, but current 1.7.1 should be used with an adaptivity
requirement from 1.8.1
:23
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] EN 300 328 V1.8.1 new Adaptive equipment requirements
In message snt108-w4738469ded84b4fb7df60ad...@phx.gbl, dated Tue, 27 Nov
2012, Mark Gandler markgand...@hotmail.com
writes:
I'm not sure how anyone can justify this makes any sense
You can submit 180 days Short term request for confidentiality pretty much on
most of the information (phots, manuals, test setup) and later on ask for 90
days extension.The longer the request higher the fee
There is also an option for permanent confidentiality request on some of the
more
In the spirit of the changes and on a slim chance this was not brought up
before,
there will be updated LVD and new RE Directive, formerly known as RTTE
Directive coming to your neighborhood theater.
RE is a new Radio Equipment directive, dropping Telecom and Terminal out of
it.
Main idea is
Lauren,
According to EU Directives all products to be placed on the market must
comply with current regulations and applicable standards. There are 2 major
sides to your question: did the product change? Did the requirements change?
You must evaluate and access your product vs new/updated
Hi there,
Wanted to get some simple data point based on your experiences across different
companies and industries: what are an altitude levels been used while
evaluating 60950-1 isolation requirements? By default you get 2000m, how many
of you used different levels?
This is driven by 5000m
with the no mountains graphic if you
can't get 5000m spacings.
On Thu, Sep 5, 2013 at 4:49 PM, Mark Gandler
markgand...@hotmail.commailto:markgand...@hotmail.com wrote:
Hi there,
Wanted to get some simple data point based on your experiences across different
companies and industries: what are an altitude
Brian,
The main safety considerations in using VDR/MOV or MOV and GDT in series in
primary circuit (at least per 60950) are outlined in section 1.5.9 and Annex Q
One key factor is about to change in EN60950-1 A2 (currently released as
IEC60950-1 ed2.2 and draft A2 for EN60950-1). Previous
Hi there,
Could someone point me to a test lab/s which can perform 20kV 1.2/50uS and 8kV
10/200uS surge test?
Thanks,
Mark
Give to a good cause with every e-mail. Join the i’m Initiative from
Microsoft.
Hi,
here is the case:
Switch powered by 100-230VAC/48DC-1A adapter with earthed plug. At 48V side,
Vcc- is connected through resistor directly to Earth ground.
This switch has PoE port, which is used to power external device (PD, powered
device), when there is a laptop connected through
to ground is meaningless. What is the value of the resistor? Isn't
one side of all shunt loads connected to ground?
Fred Townsend
Joe Randolph wrote:
On 11/10/2008, Mark Gandler wrote:
here is the case:
Switch powered
. Should the
product can not meet the requirement of Class B ITE, the importation
of the product will be prohibited upon the implement of the EMI
regulation.
Does somebody know anymore about Taiwan regulation of EMI?
Thanks,
Mark Gandler
another factor to consider while analyzing the request for DoC translation.
Some EU countries, for example France, have language laws, dictating all
information available to the user to be translated to an official language.
This by default will cover DoC. This is particularly important for
Group,
Juniper is looking for an experienced NEBS GR63 (ETSI, IEC) staff engineer.
Below is the job description. Please forward this to anyone might be interested
and guide them directly to me.
Position is in Sunnyvale CA.
Thanks,
Mark Gandler
Juniper
About the Position: Compliance
/jobdescription.html?jid=939161
Please contact me directly at mgand...@juniper.net<mailto:mgand...@juniper.net>
Thank you,
Mark Gandler (Hiring Manager)
-
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society em
is the job post. https://grnh.se/acfc73d22.
Please contact Jennifer Tran with all of the inquiries and responses.
jennifer.t...@spacex.com<mailto:jennifer.t...@spacex.com>; P: 310.970.3507
Thank you,
Mark Gandler
-
This m
John,
would be beneficial if you can share your earliest recollection of the dates,
besides stating it dates back much further.
Mark
From: John Woodgate
Organization: J M Woodgate and Associates
Reply-To: John Woodgate
Date: Monday, November 18, 2019 at 11:18 AM
To:
Subject: Re: [PSES]
Just a simple reminder, especially if anyone uses their employer or private
business devices to use AI tools: the information used for questions
immediately and forever becomes public property.
-Original Message-
From: Ralph McDiarmid
Sent: Wednesday, October 11, 2023 2:08 PM
To:
Brian,
For the context, by "registration number", do you mean FCC/ISED ID numbers? I
would estimate you are using TCB route? If yes, and if there are no major
findings, like reports deficiencies which will require re-test, it takes an
average of 2-3 weeks for TCB to review and to be able to
27 matches
Mail list logo
