From: Crane, Lauren
Sent: Friday, January 31, 2014 12:27
John,
Your reply makes sense to me, but it also brings me to
notice that circuit is used freely in the surrounding
text, and yet the standard says regulating network
rather than regulating circuit perhaps this implies
network is a
: Tuesday, February 4, 2014 10:23 AM
Subject: Re: [PSES] Meaning of regulating network in 61010-1
From: Crane, Lauren
Sent: Friday, January 31, 2014 12:27
John,
Your reply makes sense to me, but it also brings me to
notice that circuit is used freely in the surrounding
text, and yet
In message 1391542671.33395.yahoomail...@web141102.mail.bf1.yahoo.com,
dated Tue, 4 Feb 2014, sudhakar wasnik saloni95...@yahoo.com writes:
So in short impedence single element/combination is a network and RLC
single element/combination is circuit
There are millions of such examples, many of
From: sudhakar wasnik
Sent: Tuesday, February 04, 2014 11:38
So in short impedence single element/combination is a
network and RLC single element/combination is circuit.
Any takers
It's completely arbitrary whether or not a circuit is considered a
network. A differentiation could be
[mailto:lauren.cr...@kla-tencor.com]
Sent: Friday, January 31, 2014 1:54 PM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: [PSES] Meaning of regulating network in 61010-1
Does anyone have a clear idea as to what regulating network means in
61010-1:2010 section 9.4?
The Other Brian asked a similar
Does anyone have a clear idea as to what regulating network means in
61010-1:2010 section 9.4?
The Other Brian asked a similar question in 2009, but did not get an answer
(ref https://www.mail-archive.com/emc-pstc@listserv.ieee.org/msg60829.html )
Borrowing from his message (and updating to
In message
d7a120055c354bfab42e77de52b0b...@blupr03mb119.namprd03.prod.outlook.com
, dated Fri, 31 Jan 2014, Crane, Lauren lauren.cr...@kla-tencor.com
writes:
Does anyone have a clear idea as to what ?regulating network? means in
61010-1:2010 section 9.4?
It's not a defined term, so any
] Meaning of regulating network in 61010-1
Does anyone have a clear idea as to what “regulating network” means in
61010-1:2010 section 9.4?
The “Other Brian” asked a similar question in 2009, but did not get an answer
(ref https://www.mail-archive.com/emc-pstc@listserv.ieee.org/msg60829.html
-
From: John Woodgate [mailto:j...@jmwa.demon.co.uk]
Sent: Friday, January 31, 2014 1:19 PM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] Meaning of regulating network in 61010-1
In message
d7a120055c354bfab42e77de52b0b...@blupr03mb119.namprd03.prod.outlook.com
, dated Fri, 31 Jan 2014
questions or
concerns.
Doug
Douglas Powell
http://www.linkedin.com/in/dougp01
Original Message
From: Crane, Lauren
Sent: Friday, January 31, 2014 1:27 PM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Reply To: Crane, Lauren
Subject: Re: [PSES] Meaning of regulating network in 61010-1
John,
Your
In message
5e2a3fd0a2a440ba996ee9d18d6d7...@blupr03mb119.namprd03.prod.outlook.com
, dated Fri, 31 Jan 2014, Crane, Lauren lauren.cr...@kla-tencor.com
writes:
Your reply makes sense to me, but it also brings me to notice that
circuit is used freely in the surrounding text, and yet the
Powell
http://www.linkedin.com/in/dougp01
Original Message
From: John Woodgate
Sent: Friday, January 31, 2014 2:28 PM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Reply To: John Woodgate
Subject: Re: [PSES] Meaning of regulating network in 61010-1
In message
5e2a3fd0a2a440ba996ee9d18d6d7...@blupr03mb119
: 31 January, 2014 11:19 AM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] Meaning of regulating network in 61010-1
In message
d7a120055c354bfab42e77de52b0b...@blupr03mb119.namprd03.prod.outlook.com
, dated Fri, 31 Jan 2014, Crane, Lauren lauren.cr...@kla-tencor.com
writes:
Does anyone have
13 matches
Mail list logo
