Re: [PSES] Dated and undated references

that they are what was voted.  “Trust, but verify.” Ghery S. Pettit *From:* Mick Maytum *Sent:* Saturday, April 20, 2019 4:23 AM *To:* EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG *Subject:* Re: [PSES] Dated and undated references John's comment "e.g. in the rare case where a dated reference standard is

Re: [PSES] Dated and undated references

: [PSES] Dated and undated references John's comment "e.g. in the rare case where a dated reference standard is found to be seriously defective." reminded me of an IEC 62368-1:2018 problem caused by a dated reference. The current IEC 61643-331:2017 is wrong in that an earlier draf

Re: [PSES] Dated and undated references

ytum. -- Original Message -- From: "John Woodgate" To: EMC-PSTC@listserv.ieee.org Sent: 20/04/2019 08:41:51 Subject: [PSES] Dated and undated references, was: Re: [PSES] Question re: Measuring a signal in a noisy environment I changed the Subject, because my comments on

[PSES] Dated and undated references, was: Re: [PSES] Question re: Measuring a signal in a noisy environment

I changed the Subject,  because my comments on the extract below are much more general. The heading of Clause 2 (usually the Normative references clause in the past and now always so) in IEC/EN standards has changed over the years. and since I see IEC standards being cited without the 60 000