Greetings colleagues,
Thank-you to all those who have responded to my in inquiry. I appreciate
that you have taken the time to send in a response with good technical
advice.
Thank-you again,
Richard Georgerian
Applications Engineer
From: Richard Georgerian
Sent: Tuesday, April
Safety and Telecom
Standards
mjmay...@gmail.com
https://ict-surge-protection-essays.co.uk/
-- Original Message --
From: "David Schaefer"
To: EMC-PSTC@listserv.ieee.org
Sent: 02/04/2019 20:40:24
Subject: Re: [PSES] IEC 61000-4-5:2014/AMD1:2017 - Using the correct CDN
for A
W Broadway Ave
Brooklyn Park, MN 55445, United States
O +1 612 638 5136 ext. 4003
david.schae...@element.com
www.element.com
From: John Woodgate [mailto:j...@woodjohn.uk]
Sent: Tuesday, April 2, 2019 2:12 PM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] IEC 61000-4-5:2014/AMD1:2017 - Using t
I think you did (answer your own question). The text you quote seems
surprisingly (and gratifyingly) lucid. Under 16 A use a 16 A CDN. Over
16 A up to 32 A, use a 32 A CDN.
Best wishes
John Woodgate OOO-Own Opinions Only
J M Woodgate and Associates www.woodjohn.uk
Rayleigh, Essex UK
On
Greeting colleagues,
Hopefully, someone in the PSTC group can correct my rational below and
enlighten me on the finer points of CDNs.
The discussion within our applications group is, shall the EUT current
rating be correctly matched to the CDN current rating? For example, don't
use a CDN
5 matches
Mail list logo
