[PSES] IEC 61000-4-5:2014/AMD1:2017 - Using the correct CDN for AC mains testing

2019-04-06 Thread Richard Georgerian
Greetings colleagues,

 

Thank-you to all those who have responded to my in inquiry. I appreciate
that you have taken the time to send in a response with good technical
advice.

 

Thank-you again,

 

Richard Georgerian

Applications Engineer

 

From: Richard Georgerian  
Sent: Tuesday, April 2, 2019 12:15 PM
To: 'EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG' 
Subject: IEC 61000-4-5:2014/AMD1:2017 - Using the correct CDN for AC mains
testing

 

Greeting colleagues,

 

Hopefully, someone in the PSTC group can correct my rational below and
enlighten me on the finer points of CDNs.

 

The discussion within our applications group is, shall the EUT current
rating be correctly matched to the CDN current rating? For example, don't
use a CDN rated for 32 A for a EUT that is rated for 2 A, to ensure that the
correct Surge waveform will be applied to the EUT. I cannot think of a good
rational why a CDN rated for 32 A cannot be used for a EUT rated for 2 A. We
do understand that for the different current ratings of CDNs, 16 A, 32 A,
63A and 125 A, the internal components must have different values to meet
the Surge waveform, for Open circuit and Short circuit. However, testing
Open circuit and Short circuit on a CDN is without applying any currrent
through the CDN, so in effect, the Surge waveform for a 16 A CDN and a Surge
waveform for a 32 A CDN should have the same effect on a EUT drawing only 2
A of current.

 

Probably two questions would help in trying to explain what our discussion
is about.

Must we use a CDN rated for 32 A, for products with a current rating between
16 A and 32 A, to be considered being compliant to IEC 61000-4-5, for AC
mains surge testing?

Must we use a CDN rated for 16 A, for products with a current rating less
than or equal to 16 A, to be considered being compliant to IEC 61000-4-5,
for AC mains surge testing?

 

In the IEC 61000-4-5:2014, Section 7.3 Test setup for surges applied to EUT
power ports -

 

"The selection of the CDN specification from Table 4 shall be made to match
the current rating of the EUT (for example: an EUT rated at 5 A shall be
tested using a CDN complying with the

specifications of a 16 A rated CDN). Any higher current rated CDN can be
used if it meets the specification requirements in Table 4 for the relevant
lower current rating of the EUT (for

example: a CDN rated 64 A can be used for testing an EUT rated at 5 A, if it
meets the specification requirements of a 16 A rated CDN)."

 

So maybe I answered my questions.

 

Thank-you,

 

Richard Georgerian

Applications Engineer

 


-

This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc 
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to 


All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html

Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at 
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used 
formats), large files, etc.

Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to unsubscribe)
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas 
Mike Cantwell 

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher:  
David Heald: 


Re: [PSES] IEC 61000-4-5:2014/AMD1:2017 - Using the correct CDN for AC mains testing

2019-04-03 Thread Mick Maytum
As an aside, when you come to CDNs for DC systems, things can become 
more complicated and interesting.
The AMD1 came about after the US National Committee commented "“The 
method for testing DC products in the current revision of IEC61000-4-5 
is causing many field related problems for test labs and manufacturers. 
Many products will not power up through the power CDN in the standard 
and in some cases may be damaged by the

inductance that is necessary to apply the surge."
 It is easy to understand why. The large series inductance of the CDN 
presents a high pulse impedance, which prevents rapid changes of 
current, which is abnormal to the normal system configuration. 
Electronic loads like converters and inverters expect a reasonably low 
impedance supply to start and operate.


AMD1, in the body text, allows the use of a larger current-rated CDN 
with ratings ≤125 A and in Annex I (informative), Issues relating to 
powering EUT’s having DC-DC converters on their inputs, suggests a 
damping circuit for reducing possible oscillations.


Example CDN component values can be found by searching for papers like 
"Influence of Power-Line Coupling/Decoupling Network on Output 
Characteristics of the Combination Wave Generator" and "Coupling and 
decoupling network for surge immunity test on power lines"


In such a DC system using a CDN whose values force the majority of the 
surge stress on the EUT can result in unrealistic surge conditions. The 
ITU-T currently opts for a two way approach. Existing CDN arrangements 
are grandfathered while giving the test option of using a CDN with 
values that reflect the longest connecting cable thus implementing a 
system surge test rather than an individual equipment surge test. The 
ITU-T has devised an interesting test circuit that imposes a common-mode 
surge on both supply polarities. Any system polarity earthing and the 
presence of any voltage limiting functions condition the resultant surge 
on the system to be common-mode, differential mode or a mixture of both.





Regards,

Mick Maytum

Safety and Telecom
Standards

mjmay...@gmail.com

https://ict-surge-protection-essays.co.uk/


-- Original Message --
From: "David Schaefer" 
To: EMC-PSTC@listserv.ieee.org
Sent: 02/04/2019 20:40:24
Subject: Re: [PSES] IEC 61000-4-5:2014/AMD1:2017 - Using the correct CDN 
for AC mains testing


A higher current rated CDN can be used, but only if it meets the lower 
current CDN’s waveform requirements. From the quoted section:




“Any higher current rated CDN can be used if it meets the specification 
requirements in Table 4 for the relevant lower current rating of the 
EUT (for


example: a CDN rated 64 A can be used for testing an EUT rated at 5 A, 
if it meets the specification requirements of a 16 A rated CDN).”




The reason for this is higher current CDNs are allowed to have pulse 
widths significantly shorter than lower ratings. Check out Table 4 of 
the 2014 edition. A 16 amp CDN differential mode pulse width is 
required to be 50 us +/- 10 us. A 125 Amp CDN is 50 us +10 us/-30 us. 
So yes, a 64 amp CDN can be used with a 5 amp product, if it meets the 
50 us +/- 10 us requirement.




Thanks,



ELEMENT__15px.jpeg

David Schaefer
Department Manager, EMC
Element Materials Technology
9349 W Broadway Ave
Brooklyn Park, MN 55445, United States
O +1 612 638 5136 ext. 4003
david.schae...@element.com
www.element.com

LINKEDIN.jpeg
<https://www.linkedin.com/company/element-materials-technology/>
TWITTER.jpeg
<https://twitter.com/ElementTesting/>

<https://www.element.com/about-element/growth-acquisitions/exova-group-plc>








From: John Woodgate [mailto:j...@woodjohn.uk]
Sent: Tuesday, April 2, 2019 2:12 PM
To:EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] IEC 61000-4-5:2014/AMD1:2017 - Using the correct 
CDN for AC mains testing




I think you did (answer your own question). The text you quote seems 
surprisingly (and gratifyingly) lucid. Under 16 A use a 16 A CDN. Over 
16 A up to 32 A, use a 32 A CDN.


Best wishes
John Woodgate OOO-Own Opinions Only
J M Woodgate and Associates www.woodjohn.uk
Rayleigh, Essex UK
On 2019-04-02 19:14, Richard Georgerian wrote:


Greeting colleagues,



Hopefully, someone in the PSTC group can correct my rational below and 
enlighten me on the finer points of CDNs.




The discussion within our applications group is, shall the EUT current 
rating be correctly matched to the CDN current rating? For example, 
don’t use a CDN rated for 32 A for a EUT that is rated for 2 A, to 
ensure that the correct Surge waveform will be applied to the EUT. I 
cannot think of a good rational why a CDN rated for 32 A cannot be 
used for a EUT rated for 2 A. We do understand that for the different 
current ratings of CDNs, 16 A, 32 A, 63A and 125 A, the internal 
components must have different values to meet the Surge waveform, for 
Open circuit and Short circuit. However, testing Open c

Re: [PSES] IEC 61000-4-5:2014/AMD1:2017 - Using the correct CDN for AC mains testing

2019-04-02 Thread David Schaefer
A higher current rated CDN can be used, but only if it meets the lower current 
CDN's waveform requirements. From the quoted section:

"Any higher current rated CDN can be used if it meets the specification 
requirements in Table 4 for the relevant lower current rating of the EUT (for
example: a CDN rated 64 A can be used for testing an EUT rated at 5 A, if it 
meets the specification requirements of a 16 A rated CDN)."

The reason for this is higher current CDNs are allowed to have pulse widths 
significantly shorter than lower ratings. Check out Table 4 of the 2014 
edition. A 16 amp CDN differential mode pulse width is required to be 50 us +/- 
10 us. A 125 Amp CDN is 50 us +10 us/-30 us. So yes, a 64 amp CDN can be used 
with a 5 amp product, if it meets the 50 us +/- 10 us requirement.

Thanks,



David Schaefer
Department Manager, EMC
Element Materials Technology
9349 W Broadway Ave
Brooklyn Park, MN 55445, United States
O +1 612 638 5136 ext. 4003
david.schae...@element.com
www.element.com
 


From: John Woodgate [mailto:j...@woodjohn.uk]
Sent: Tuesday, April 2, 2019 2:12 PM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] IEC 61000-4-5:2014/AMD1:2017 - Using the correct CDN for AC 
mains testing


I think you did (answer your own question). The text you quote seems 
surprisingly (and gratifyingly) lucid. Under 16 A use a 16 A CDN. Over 16 A up 
to 32 A, use a 32 A CDN.

Best wishes

John Woodgate OOO-Own Opinions Only

J M Woodgate and Associates www.woodjohn.uk<http://www.woodjohn.uk>

Rayleigh, Essex UK
On 2019-04-02 19:14, Richard Georgerian wrote:
Greeting colleagues,

Hopefully, someone in the PSTC group can correct my rational below and 
enlighten me on the finer points of CDNs.

The discussion within our applications group is, shall the EUT current rating 
be correctly matched to the CDN current rating? For example, don't use a CDN 
rated for 32 A for a EUT that is rated for 2 A, to ensure that the correct 
Surge waveform will be applied to the EUT. I cannot think of a good rational 
why a CDN rated for 32 A cannot be used for a EUT rated for 2 A. We do 
understand that for the different current ratings of CDNs, 16 A, 32 A, 63A and 
125 A, the internal components must have different values to meet the Surge 
waveform, for Open circuit and Short circuit. However, testing Open circuit and 
Short circuit on a CDN is without applying any currrent through the CDN, so in 
effect, the Surge waveform for a 16 A CDN and a Surge waveform for a 32 A CDN 
should have the same effect on a EUT drawing only 2 A of current.

Probably two questions would help in trying to explain what our discussion is 
about.
Must we use a CDN rated for 32 A, for products with a current rating between 16 
A and 32 A, to be considered being compliant to IEC 61000-4-5, for AC mains 
surge testing?
Must we use a CDN rated for 16 A, for products with a current rating less than 
or equal to 16 A, to be considered being compliant to IEC 61000-4-5, for AC 
mains surge testing?

In the IEC 61000-4-5:2014, Section 7.3 Test setup for surges applied to EUT 
power ports -

"The selection of the CDN specification from Table 4 shall be made to match the 
current rating of the EUT (for example: an EUT rated at 5 A shall be tested 
using a CDN complying with the
specifications of a 16 A rated CDN). Any higher current rated CDN can be used 
if it meets the specification requirements in Table 4 for the relevant lower 
current rating of the EUT (for
example: a CDN rated 64 A can be used for testing an EUT rated at 5 A, if it 
meets the specification requirements of a 16 A rated CDN)."

So maybe I answered my questions.

Thank-you,

Richard Georgerian
Applications Engineer

-


This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc 
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to 
mailto:emc-p...@ieee.org>>

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: 
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html<http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html>

Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at 
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/<http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/> 
can be used for graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc.

Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/<http://www.ieee-pses.org/>
Instructions: http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to 
unsubscribe)<http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html>
List rules: 
http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html<http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html>

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas mailto:sdoug...@ieee.org>>
Mike Cantwell mailto:mcantw...@ieee.org>>

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher mailto:j.bac...@ieee.org>>
David Heald mailto:dhe...@gmail.com>>
-


This

Re: [PSES] IEC 61000-4-5:2014/AMD1:2017 - Using the correct CDN for AC mains testing

2019-04-02 Thread John Woodgate
I think you did (answer your own question). The text you quote seems 
surprisingly (and gratifyingly) lucid. Under 16 A use a 16 A CDN. Over 
16 A up to 32 A, use a 32 A CDN.


Best wishes
John Woodgate OOO-Own Opinions Only
J M Woodgate and Associates www.woodjohn.uk
Rayleigh, Essex UK

On 2019-04-02 19:14, Richard Georgerian wrote:


Greeting colleagues,

Hopefully, someone in the PSTC group can correct my rational below and 
enlighten me on the finer points of CDNs.


The discussion within our applications group is, shall the EUT current 
rating be correctly matched to the CDN current rating? For example, 
don’t use a CDN rated for 32 A for a EUT that is rated for 2 A, to 
ensure that the correct Surge waveform will be applied to the EUT. I 
cannot think of a good rational why a CDN rated for 32 A cannot be 
used for a EUT rated for 2 A. We do understand that for the different 
current ratings of CDNs, 16 A, 32 A, 63A and 125 A, the internal 
components must have different values to meet the Surge waveform, for 
Open circuit and Short circuit. However, testing Open circuit and 
Short circuit on a CDN is without applying any currrent through the 
CDN, so in effect, the Surge waveform for a 16 A CDN and a Surge 
waveform for a 32 A CDN should have the same effect on a EUT drawing 
only 2 A of current.


Probably two questions would help in trying to explain what our 
discussion is about.


Must we use a CDN rated for 32 A, for products with a current rating 
between 16 A and 32 A, to be considered being compliant to IEC 
61000-4-5, for AC mains surge testing?


Must we use a CDN rated for 16 A, for products with a current rating 
less than or equal to 16 A, to be considered being compliant to IEC 
61000-4-5, for AC mains surge testing?


In the IEC 61000-4-5:2014, Section 7.3 Test setup for surges applied 
to EUT power ports –


“The selection of the CDN specification from Table 4 shall be made to 
match the current rating of the EUT (for example: an EUT rated at 5 A 
shall be tested using a CDN complying with the


specifications of a 16 A rated CDN). Any higher current rated CDN can 
be used if it meets the specification requirements in Table 4 for the 
relevant lower current rating of the EUT (for


example: a CDN rated 64 A can be used for testing an EUT rated at 5 A, 
if it meets the specification requirements of a 16 A rated CDN).”


So maybe I answered my questions.

Thank-you,

Richard Georgerian

Applications Engineer

-


This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society 
emc-pstc discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your 
e-mail to mailto:emc-p...@ieee.org>>


All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: 
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html


Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities 
site at http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for 
graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc.


Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions: http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to 
unsubscribe)

List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas mailto:sdoug...@ieee.org>>
Mike Cantwell mailto:mcantw...@ieee.org>>

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher mailto:j.bac...@ieee.org>>
David Heald mailto:dhe...@gmail.com>>



-

This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion 
list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to 

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html

Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at 
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used 
formats), large files, etc.

Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to unsubscribe)
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas 
Mike Cantwell 

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher:  
David Heald: 


[PSES] IEC 61000-4-5:2014/AMD1:2017 - Using the correct CDN for AC mains testing

2019-04-02 Thread Richard Georgerian
Greeting colleagues,

 

Hopefully, someone in the PSTC group can correct my rational below and
enlighten me on the finer points of CDNs.

 

The discussion within our applications group is, shall the EUT current
rating be correctly matched to the CDN current rating? For example, don't
use a CDN rated for 32 A for a EUT that is rated for 2 A, to ensure that the
correct Surge waveform will be applied to the EUT. I cannot think of a good
rational why a CDN rated for 32 A cannot be used for a EUT rated for 2 A. We
do understand that for the different current ratings of CDNs, 16 A, 32 A,
63A and 125 A, the internal components must have different values to meet
the Surge waveform, for Open circuit and Short circuit. However, testing
Open circuit and Short circuit on a CDN is without applying any currrent
through the CDN, so in effect, the Surge waveform for a 16 A CDN and a Surge
waveform for a 32 A CDN should have the same effect on a EUT drawing only 2
A of current.

 

Probably two questions would help in trying to explain what our discussion
is about.

Must we use a CDN rated for 32 A, for products with a current rating between
16 A and 32 A, to be considered being compliant to IEC 61000-4-5, for AC
mains surge testing?

Must we use a CDN rated for 16 A, for products with a current rating less
than or equal to 16 A, to be considered being compliant to IEC 61000-4-5,
for AC mains surge testing?

 

In the IEC 61000-4-5:2014, Section 7.3 Test setup for surges applied to EUT
power ports -

 

"The selection of the CDN specification from Table 4 shall be made to match
the current rating of the EUT (for example: an EUT rated at 5 A shall be
tested using a CDN complying with the

specifications of a 16 A rated CDN). Any higher current rated CDN can be
used if it meets the specification requirements in Table 4 for the relevant
lower current rating of the EUT (for

example: a CDN rated 64 A can be used for testing an EUT rated at 5 A, if it
meets the specification requirements of a 16 A rated CDN)."

 

So maybe I answered my questions.

 

Thank-you,

 

Richard Georgerian

Applications Engineer

 


-

This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc 
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to 


All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html

Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at 
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used 
formats), large files, etc.

Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to unsubscribe)
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas 
Mike Cantwell 

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher:  
David Heald: