Re: [PSES] Woodgate's reply on residential Immunity field strength

2023-07-27 Thread Brian Kunde
The exposure limits according to the ICNIRP depends on frequency, of course. >From 1hz to 300hz the Occupational limits are like 20kV/m for E-Field and 40k to 200uT. >From 3khz to 10Mhz the limit is 170V/m (100uT). For the General Public (up to 24 hours a day), the limit is 83V/m (27uT). For

Re: [PSES] Woodgate's reply on residential Immunity field strength

2023-07-27 Thread John Woodgate
The EM field exposure limits are not always in standards: in Europe they are in a European Council document based on Commission-funded research (ICNIRP). I don't recall any limits as low as 10 V/m. On 2023-07-27 19:07, Richard Nute wrote: I’m a product safety engineer.  This discussion is

Re: [PSES] Woodgate's reply on residential Immunity field strength

2023-07-27 Thread Ken Javor
.” -- Ken Javor (256) 650-5261 From: Richard Nute Reply-To: Date: Thursday, July 27, 2023 at 1:07 PM To: Subject: Re: [PSES] Woodgate's reply on residential Immunity field strength I’m a product safety engineer. This discussion is based upon a safety standard specifying a limit

Re: [PSES] Woodgate's reply on residential Immunity field strength

2023-07-27 Thread Richard Nute
I'm a product safety engineer. This discussion is based upon a safety standard specifying a limit for the accessible electric field strength. Doug Smith said: "These days we think 10 V/m is dangerous." See: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3553569/

Re: [PSES] Woodgate's reply on residential Immunity field strength

2023-07-25 Thread Ken Javor
From: "doug emcesd.com" Reply-To: "doug emcesd.com" Date: Tuesday, July 25, 2023 at 6:53 PM To: Subject: Re: [PSES] Woodgate's reply on residential Immunity field strength Hi All, My observation is that a cell phone at max power, close to the product, generates v

Re: [PSES] Woodgate's reply on residential Immunity field strength

2023-07-25 Thread doug emcesd.com
ontent.com/_HuR3Ky2TF_XhFHyxnYRmiq7nHQldnMsPNYFaLG6kb5T4y8MeCe-BDC_BscJtSFgszSSjssihHS-pjM3-jwNP8S0CwE-gN8fsRsPkojiAlmpBwb20vIVizS-siCUywW_jqrefbVr] From: Charlie Blackham Sent: Tuesday, July 25, 2023 0:06 To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG Subject: Re: [PSES] Woodgate's reply on residential Immunity field strength The residential lev

Re: [PSES] Woodgate's reply on residential Immunity field strength

2023-07-25 Thread Charlie Blackham
://sulisconsultants.com/ Registered in England and Wales, number 05466247 From: Brian Gregory Sent: Monday, July 24, 2023 10:49 PM To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG Subject: Re: [PSES] Woodgate's reply on residential Immunity field strength The reference for 20 V/m to EV chargers comes from UL 2231-2

Re: [PSES] Woodgate's reply on residential Immunity field strength

2023-07-25 Thread James Pawson (U3C)
to:he...@unit3compliance.co.uk> or call 01274 911747. Our lead times for testing and consultancy are typically 4-5 weeks. From: Brian Gregory Sent: Monday, July 24, 2023 10:49 PM To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG Subject: Re: [PSES] Woodgate's reply on residential Immunity field str

Re: [PSES] Woodgate's reply on residential Immunity field strength

2023-07-24 Thread Jim Bacher, WB8VSU
Yes. The standards need to allow for possibilities. I have about a 3 dB gain antenna that is about a meter away from the charger port. It transmits about 15 watts at 144.39 MHz to send out an APRS position packet. I recently bought a PHEV, although my 2 minute timer is not yet installed, but

Re: [PSES] Woodgate's reply on residential Immunity field strength

2023-07-24 Thread Ken Javor
at 5:03 PM To: Subject: Re: [PSES] Woodgate's reply on residential Immunity field strength There are, but 20 V/m still is a very high value. One wouldn't expect a transmitter to be used in a car while it is on charge. On 2023-07-24 22:57, Jim Bacher, WB8VSU wrote: Wi-Fi and cell phones

Re: [PSES] Woodgate's reply on residential Immunity field strength

2023-07-24 Thread John Woodgate
While the vehicle is on charge or vey near a charger? On 2023-07-24 23:12, Jim Bacher, WB8VSU wrote: John, I have transmitter that transmits on a VHF Frequency about 2 minutes after I shut the car off. A number of setups allow a person to use a hand held device to access a higher powered

Re: [PSES] Woodgate's reply on residential Immunity field strength

2023-07-24 Thread Jim Bacher, WB8VSU
John, I have transmitter that transmits on a VHF Frequency about 2 minutes after I shut the car off. A number of setups allow a person to use a hand held device to access a higher powered transceiver that is in the car. It's fairly common setup for highway patrol vehicles, due to distance from

Re: [PSES] Woodgate's reply on residential Immunity field strength

2023-07-24 Thread Ken Javor
to use round numbers). -- Ken Javor (256) 650-5261 From: Brian Gregory Reply-To: Brian Gregory Date: Monday, July 24, 2023 at 4:49 PM To: Subject: Re: [PSES] Woodgate's reply on residential Immunity field strength The reference for 20 V/m to EV chargers comes from UL 2231-2

Re: [PSES] Woodgate's reply on residential Immunity field strength

2023-07-24 Thread John Woodgate
There are, but 20 V/m still is a very high value. One wouldn't expect a transmitter to be used in a car while it is on charge. On 2023-07-24 22:57, Jim Bacher, WB8VSU wrote: Wi-Fi and cell phones are not the only transmitters near cars. There are police, fire and ham radio transceivers in

Re: [PSES] Woodgate's reply on residential Immunity field strength

2023-07-24 Thread Jim Bacher, WB8VSU
Wi-Fi and cell phones are not the only transmitters near cars. There are police, fire and ham radio transceivers in cars. Some of which are on gain antennas and can be remotely accessed to transmit. Not to mention hand held transceivers that might walk by. Jim, WB8VSU On July 24, 2023

Re: [PSES] Woodgate's reply on residential Immunity field strength

2023-07-24 Thread Brian Gregory
The reference for 20 V/m to EV chargers comes from UL 2231-2. This is not a medical standard, but Annex A does call out the medical standard 60601-1-2 as a reference, as well as CENELEC 50204. We can't figure out why; cell phones produce less than half that, and our WiFi transmitter is