Dear EMC-PSTC forum members,
Given a need to measure conducted emissions from 150kHz down to 9kHz,
would it be better to:
1. characterise 50ohm LISN for insertion loss down to 9kHz
2. use a current clamp rated for that frequency and use transfer impedance
to determine dB(uV)
I can see that
- emission measurements below 150kHz
Dear EMC-PSTC forum members,
Given a need to measure conducted emissions from 150kHz down to 9kHz, would
it be better to:
1. characterise 50ohm LISN for insertion loss down to 9kHz
2. use a current clamp rated for that frequency and use transfer impedance
In message
OFD7811909.ED5ACDC0-ON88257BE8.0071ED63-88257BE8.00729F29@US.Schneider-E
lectric.com, dated Mon, 16 Sep 2013, McDiarmid, Ralph
ralph.mcdiar...@schneider-electric.com writes:
Given a need to measure conducted emissions from 150kHz down to 9kHz,
would it be better to:
1.
to the compliance document to tell you which method to use.
Ed Price
WB6WSN
Chula Vista, CA USA
From: McDiarmid, Ralph [mailto:ralph.mcdiar...@schneider-electric.com]
Sent: Monday, September 16, 2013 1:52 PM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] question - emission measurements below
@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] question - emission measurements below 150kHz
Dear EMC-PSTC forum members,
Given a need to measure conducted emissions from 150kHz down to 9kHz, would it
be better to:
1. characterise 50ohm LISN for insertion loss down to 9kHz
2. use a current clamp rated
5 matches
Mail list logo