200108012153.oaa24...@epgc196.sdd.hp.com, Rich Nute ri...@sdd.hp.com
inimitably wrote:
My argument with the equipment class concept is
that few equipment are truly fit one of the
classes. I prefere to replace the word equipment
with the word circuit. Now, I can apply the
different class
)
Message-ID: ae7vhjarega7e...@jmwa.demon.co.uk
Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2001 21:05:37 +0100
To: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
From: John Woodgate j...@jmwa.demon.co.uk
Subject: Re: Class III anomoly
References: 200107311606.jaa21...@epgc196.sdd.hp.com
3b683241.1010...@ma.ultranet.com
In-Reply
3b683241.1010...@ma.ultranet.com, Robert Johnson
robe...@ma.ultranet.com inimitably wrote:
This came up at IEC TC74 WG8 and was the object of several
proposals. We could come to no agreement about whether Class III
included TNV, earth connections, internally generated voltages of
This came up at IEC TC74 WG8 and was the object of several proposals. We
could come to no agreement about whether Class III included TNV, earth
connections, internally generated voltages of assorted energies, etc.,
so we dropped the subject. It plays no part in the safety requirements
of IEC
This came up at IEC TC74 WG8 and was the object of several proposals. We
could come to no agreement about whether Class III included TNV, earth
connections, internally generated voltages of assorted energies, etc.,
so we dropped the subject. It plays no part in the safety requirements
of IEC
5 matches
Mail list logo
