RE: SV: EN 50141 and EN 61000-4-6

2002-01-16 Thread CE-test - Ing. Gert Gremmen - ce-marking and more...
Currently under vote the prA2:2001 on EN 50130-4 -Immunitytesting to 2000 MHz -replace ENV 50141:1993 reference by EN 61000-4-6 (no date). Regards, Gert Gremmen, (Ing) ce-test, qualified testing === Web presence http://www.cetest.nl CE-shop http

Re: SV: SV: EN 50141 and EN 61000-4-6

2002-01-15 Thread John Woodgate
I read in !emc-pstc that am...@westin-emission.no wrote (in LFENJLPMMJB mhpeibnilkecnccaa.am...@westin-emission.no) about 'SV: SV: EN 50141 and EN 61000-4-6', on Tue, 15 Jan 2002: From this document I feel that CENELEC from now on, want us to use EN61000-4-6 instead of ENV50141. or have I

Re: SV: EN 50141 and EN 61000-4-6

2002-01-15 Thread John Woodgate
I read in !emc-pstc that am...@westin-emission.no wrote (in LFENJLPMMJB mhpeibnilaeclccaa.am...@westin-emission.no) about 'SV: EN 50141 and EN 61000-4-6', on Mon, 14 Jan 2002: When CELELEC tells us that EN61000-4-6 (which also is a CENELEC document) replaces ENV50141, I can't see why we still

Re: EN 50141 and EN 61000-4-6

2002-01-14 Thread Charles Grasso
I had to laugh when I saw the comparison between EMC and dentistry...How appropriate..!! From: John Woodgate j...@jmwa.demon.co.uk Reply-To: John Woodgate j...@jmwa.demon.co.uk To: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org Subject: Re: EN 50141 and EN 61000-4-6 Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2002 14:32:29 + I

SV: EN 50141 and EN 61000-4-6

2002-01-14 Thread amund
cases like this, we have to be some kind of pragmatic . Amund -Opprinnelig melding- Fra: owner-emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org [mailto:owner-emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org]På vegne av Kevin Harris Sendt: 14. januar 2002 18:14 Til: EMC-PSTC (E-mail) Emne: RE: EN 50141 and EN 61000-4-6

RE: EN 50141 and EN 61000-4-6

2002-01-14 Thread richwoods
, January 14, 2002 11:09 AM To: cet...@cetest.nl; John Woodgate; emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org Subject: RE: EN 50141 and EN 61000-4-6 So what do I do? Follow the EN 50130-4 : 1996 standard that states; The test apparatus procedure shall be as described in ENV 50141 : 1993, with the following modifications

RE: EN 50141 and EN 61000-4-6

2002-01-14 Thread Kevin Harris
[mailto:rma...@pelco.com] Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 11:09 AM To: cet...@cetest.nl; John Woodgate; emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org Subject:RE: EN 50141 and EN 61000-4-6 So what do I do? Follow the EN 50130-4 : 1996 standard that states; The test apparatus procedure shall

RE: EN 50141 and EN 61000-4-6

2002-01-14 Thread Mavis, Robert
- From: CE-test - Ing. Gert Gremmen - ce-marking and more... [mailto:cet...@cetest.nl] Sent: Saturday, January 12, 2002 10:55 AM To: Mavis, Robert; John Woodgate; emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org Subject: RE: EN 50141 and EN 61000-4-6 It looks as if you are right, but in the case of any ENV version

Re: EN 50141 and EN 61000-4-6

2002-01-14 Thread John Woodgate
I read in !emc-pstc that Chris Chileshe chris.chile...@ultronics.co.uk wrote (in 01c19cdd.70365940.chris.chile...@ultronics.co.uk) about 'EN 50141 and EN 61000-4-6', on Mon, 14 Jan 2002: John, I found reference to a draft IEC801-5 and it appears it is the surge immunity, now IEC/EN 61000-4-5

Re: EN 50141 and EN 61000-4-6

2002-01-13 Thread John Woodgate
I read in !emc-pstc that CE-test - Ing. Gert Gremmen - ce-marking and more... cet...@cetest.nl wrote (in ABEJKCKDFONELAIPOFHNMEIGEMAA.cetes t...@cetest.nl) about 'EN 50141 and EN 61000-4-6', on Sun, 13 Jan 2002: As a member of the Dutch Committee EMC 2 I emphasize these topics at every

Re: EN 50141 and EN 61000-4-6

2002-01-12 Thread John Woodgate
I read in !emc-pstc that Mavis, Robert rma...@pelco.com wrote (in B2CC0E0F2C10D511B86600B0D068984202610968@localhost.pelco1) about 'EN 50141 and EN 61000-4-6', on Fri, 11 Jan 2002: Even though the ENV is a pre-standard, if a Product Family Standard calls it out you must test to it. Am I

RE: EN 50141 and EN 61000-4-6

2002-01-12 Thread Mavis, Robert
John, Even though the ENV is a pre-standard, if a Product Family Standard calls it out you must test to it. Am I not correct. Case in point, EN 50130-4 Product Family Standard for Alarm Systems calls out specifically ENV 50141 not EN 61000-4-6. -Original Message- From: John Woodgate

Re: EN 50141 and EN 61000-4-6

2002-01-12 Thread Patrick Lawler
61000-4-6', on Fri, 11 Jan 2002: This is a more of a general question, since I would actually test to EN61000-6-2 (which references EN61000-4-6.) You can't do that for a UPS; the product standard takes precedence **whether you like it or not**. You can't choose to apply the Generic if a product

Re: EN 50141 and EN 61000-4-6

2002-01-11 Thread John Woodgate
I read in !emc-pstc that Patrick Lawler plaw...@west.net wrote (in d86u3ukalc0klgvpifajq86e13bmrcf...@4ax.com) about 'EN 50141 and EN 61000-4-6', on Fri, 11 Jan 2002: This is a more of a general question, since I would actually test to EN61000-6-2 (which references EN61000-4-6.) You can't do

Re: EN 50141 and EN 61000-4-6

2002-01-11 Thread John Woodgate
I read in !emc-pstc that Chris Chileshe chris.chile...@ultronics.co.uk wrote (in 01c19a92.f4398e80.chris.chile...@ultronics.co.uk) about 'EN 50141 and EN 61000-4-6', on Fri, 11 Jan 2002: I am testing to the generic immunity standard EN 61000-6-2 which refers to EN 61000-4-6 for immunity

EN 50141 and EN 61000-4-6

2002-01-11 Thread Chris Chileshe
Hi group, I am testing to the generic immunity standard EN 61000-6-2 which refers to EN 61000-4-6 for immunity to conducted disturbances induced by radio-frequency fields. A query has arisen that EN 50141 is missing from my list of tests. Is my understanding correct that these two standards