Hi Ilan:
> I was looking for a viable comparison between glow wire and the UL94
> flammability rating. The point of this little comparison is to bypass the
> glow wire test for materials, which are properly rated for UL94.
There is no comparison between the glow-wire test and
the flam
ohen [mailto:ico...@itl.co.il]
> Sent: Monday, May 19, 2003 7:29 AM
> To: 'peter.tar...@sanmina-sci.com';
> emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
> Subject: RE: Glow Wire test vs. UL94 - flammability rating
>
>
> Peter
>
> Would it be correct to say that a V0 or
ico...@itl.co.il, website: http://www.itl.co.il
From: Peter L. Tarver [mailto:peter.tar...@sanmina-sci.com]
Sent: Monday, May 19, 2003 4:16 PM
To: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
Cc: Ilan Cohen
Subject: RE: Glow Wire test vs. UL94 - flammability rating
Ilan -
The test methods are entirely different
Ilan -
The test methods are entirely different and, therefore, the
result are not directly comparable. If you were to take
enough time to review all available data, you might be able
to derive a statistical correlation between flammability
classification and glow wire results, but you won't save
Guys
I am having hard time trying to compare between flammability rating
according to UL and the glow wire test. In many of the safety standards (for
example IEC335 series) a glow wire test is required and UL94 rated materials
are not an option (or maybe they are?).
I was looking for a viable co
5 matches
Mail list logo
