Hi Martin and Richard,
The world consists of ordinary people and lawmakers. As ordinary people we must
comply with laws, and respect the wisdom behind laws. On the other hand,
ordinary people also have some ways to express their views on the current laws
in modern democratic society. All
: RE: The wisdom behind all these standrads
Maybe I'm reading Martin's message wrong. If I am, then I apologize.
Here's my response to Martin's message.
Based on what I've learned (?) over the years, the intent of these
standards is to
control interference. I think this is a good thing. I
Hi Martin:
There are three issues in your message:
1) compliance to the standard;
2) reasonableness or appropriateness of the standard;
3) value added to the product through compliance.
You point out that messages posted to this list address
compliance to the standard, but not the other
In cases where the standard is a public standard, i.e. law,
then we are obliged to comply no matter what we think, agree
or disagree. In cases where the standard is a private
standard, it is sometimes negotiated with a customer thru
contracts.
This may give the sense that two things
Maybe I'm reading Martin's message wrong. If I am, then I apologize.
Here's my response to Martin's message.
Based on what I've learned (?) over the years, the intent of these standards
is to
control interference. I think this is a good thing. I don't necessarily
agree with
some of the limits
5 matches
Mail list logo
