Re: Y3K

2000-01-18 Thread David Instone
Derek Walton wrote: Gary, as a European school kid, we had it driven into us that: K is for the binary world, i.e. 1K=1024 k is the metric symbol for 1000 The trouble comes in when folks get sloppy and substitute willy nilly. Perhaps we should measure current in volts...;-)))

Re: Y3K

2000-01-12 Thread Robert Macy
: Re: Y3K Roger, Most of this problem occurs from the Latin M= 1000 and the Greek K=1000 What came later just confused the issue- is this an example of a decision by committee(s) ? Ralph Cameron - This message is coming from the emc-pstc discussion list. To cancel your subscription

Re: Y3K

2000-01-11 Thread Ralph Cameron
: Tuesday, January 11, 2000 5:38 AM Subject: RE: Y3K Thanks to all who made their comments following my complaint about the misuse of K for 1000. Maybe a final word about this problem! The IEC (even more pedantic!) are attempting to fix this by creating a new set of units for binary multiples

RE: Y3K

2000-01-11 Thread roger . viles
of prefixes ! Roger Gary McInturff gmcintu...@telect.com on 06/01/2000 22:49:38 Please respond to Gary McInturff gmcintu...@telect.com To: 'Egon H. Varju' e...@varju.bc.ca, EMC-PSTC emc-p...@ieee.org cc:(bcc: Roger Viles/PLY/Global) Subject: RE: Y3K Oh my last birthday my

RE: Y3K

2000-01-10 Thread Mark
I wrote: But I'm going to bite (though I'll regret it later no doubt) - what's CPS? Yes, I regret asking... funny how some things are just too obvious? Especially as most of my test equipment is marked in Mc/s. Regards, Mark PS has anyone got an Excel spread sheet they can send me to

Re: Y3K

2000-01-10 Thread Dan Kwok
Hi Wolf, Yes, 53kbps does seem to ring the bell. With my POP located a mile from the CO, the connection speed rarely exceeds 49kbps using an USR 56K Sportster modem. My other Lucent 56K Winmodem usually achieves a 37kbps connection speed from the same POP. Thanks for the confirmation. Regards,

Re: Y3K

2000-01-08 Thread Dan Kwok
Anil Allamaneni wrote: I might have faux-pased (nice way of saying, screwed up). Apologies! Hi Anil, No harm done. There is a modem speed test at http://www.computingcentral.com/topics/bandwidth/ . Click on Bandwidth Speed Test and try it out. --

RE: Y3K

2000-01-08 Thread Anil Allamaneni
I might have faux-pased (nice way of saying, screwed up). Apologies! -Original Message- From: owner-emc-p...@ieee.org [mailto:owner-emc-p...@ieee.org]On Behalf Of Dan Kwok Sent: Friday, January 07, 2000 8:03 PM To: Anil Allamaneni; EMC-TSTC Group Subject: Re: Y3K Anil Allamaneni

RE: Y3K

2000-01-08 Thread Egon H. Varju
At 12:58 AM 08/01/2000 , you wrote: I saw a CPS to Hz conversion chart in a military (AF) test report back in the 70s. The 'X' axis (CPS) was decimal and the 'Y' axis (Hz) was Log. It provided an interesting conversion curve. It even had a formula to do the conversion long hand. We need

Re: Y3K

2000-01-08 Thread Dan Kwok
Anil Allamaneni wrote: I dont think this is right. There are times when my modem says data is being transferred at 10k/s. So does that mean actual throughput is 10x8 = 80kbps from a 56kbps modem ?? Data transfer over an analog line would essentially depend on your line and the distance from

Re: Y3K

2000-01-08 Thread Ralph Cameron
Hans and Dan: You're overlooking the fact that by definition in modern computers a byte = 8 bits so when they say 100Mb drive they mean exactly that, 100 megabytes = 800 megabits capacity. ( if you ignore the parity bit which is seldom transmitted or recorded.). . A 56K modem downloads files

RE: Y3K

2000-01-08 Thread Anil Allamaneni
I dont think this is right. There are times when my modem says data is being transferred at 10k/s. So does that mean actual throughput is 10x8 = 80kbps from a 56kbps modem ?? Data transfer over an analog line would essentially depend on your line and the distance from CO (besides your system).

Re: Y3K

2000-01-08 Thread Bruce Touzel
Please respond to m...@cjbdev.demon.co.uk (Mark) To: emc-p...@ieee.org cc:(bcc: Robert E. Heller/US-Corporate/3M/US) Subject: Re: Y3K Anyway, in waxing nostalgic, I wonder how many of us recall the CPS unit. :-) Best regards, Ron Pickard rpick...@hypercom.com When I

Re: Y3K

2000-01-07 Thread Dan Kwok
Hello everyone; Of the more recent units that have been a major source of confusion for many Internet users, myself included, were the units for download speeds: K/sec versus kbps. It made a lot of users wonder why their 56K modem only downloaded files at 5K/sec instead of say- 40 kbps. It

RE: Y3K

2000-01-07 Thread Pettit, Ghery
Cycles per second Ghery Pettit Intel -Original Message- From: m...@cjbdev.demon.co.uk [mailto:m...@cjbdev.demon.co.uk] Sent: Friday, January 07, 2000 5:00 AM To: emc-p...@ieee.org Subject: Re: Y3K Anyway, in waxing nostalgic, I wonder how many of us recall the CPS unit

Re: Y3K

2000-01-07 Thread reheller
Recall it? I still use it ! === m...@cjbdev.demon.co.uk (Mark) on 01/07/2000 07:00:20 AM Please respond to m...@cjbdev.demon.co.uk (Mark) To: emc-p...@ieee.org cc:(bcc: Robert E. Heller/US-Corporate/3M/US) Subject: Re: Y3K Anyway

RE: Y3K

2000-01-07 Thread Price, Ed
To: james_al...@milgo.com Cc: emc-p...@ieee.org Subject: RE: Y3K I saw a CPS to Hz conversion chart in a military (AF) test report back in the 70s. The 'X' axis (CPS) was decimal and the 'Y' axis (Hz) was Log. It provided an interesting conversion curve. It even had a formula to do

Re: Y3K

2000-01-07 Thread Ralph Cameron
Not so strange these circuits from 1926- figs 34 and 34 are examples. Parallel , Yes. Ralph - Original Message - From: Egon H. Varju e...@varju.bc.ca To: EMC-PSTC emc-p...@ieee.org Sent: Thursday, January 06, 2000 12:17 PM Subject: Re: Y3K Roger, way back in the days of the caveman

Re: Y3K

2000-01-07 Thread owsley
I forgot everybody... you don't know what CPS is ??? that Hertz... Bill Owsley, EMC Engineer EMC Design - Do It First... Do It Last... But It must be Done... - This message is coming from the emc-pstc discussion list. To cancel your subscription, send mail to majord...@ieee.org

Re: Y3K

2000-01-07 Thread Hans Mellberg
speaking of garbled use of units, How many buy hardrives in bits? everyone I hear says bytes as in a 10 megabyte HD. They even abbreviate is as 10 MB when it should be called a 10 Megabit drive (10 Mb) with little b as big B is for Byte. = Best Regards Hans Mellberg EMC Consultant

Re: Y3K

2000-01-07 Thread Martin Rowe (TMW)
Our magazine's standard is k for both 1000 and for 1024. So, 1024 bytes appears as 1 kbyte (we always spell out byte. I suppose we'd use k for Boltzmann's constant. Upper case K is for Kelvin. We use M for mega (1 million) and m for milli (1/1000). We also use M for the binary, as in 1 Mbytes.

RE: Y3K

2000-01-07 Thread ooverton
=; james_allan%milgo@interlock.lexmark.com on 01/07/2000 09:43:34 AM Please respond to james_allan%milgo@interlock.lexmark.com To: rpickard%hypercom@interlock.lexmark.com, emc-pstc%ieee@interlock.lexmark.com cc:(bcc: Oscar Overton/Lex/Lexmark) Subject: RE: Y3K Seems

RE: Y3K

2000-01-07 Thread owsley
From a previous life where we tried to build computer boxes using plastic, it was; CPS = Cheap Plastic S... sometimes referred to as case hardened latex. Bill Owsley, EMC Engineer EMC Design - Do It First... Do It Last... But It must be Done... - This message is coming from the

RE: Y3K

2000-01-07 Thread Mike Hopkins
case) as milli. The 1998 EMC Encyclopedia shows M = mega and m = milli. Mike Hopkins KeyTek -Original Message- From: Gary McInturff [SMTP:gmcintu...@telect.com] Sent: Thursday, January 06, 2000 5:50 PM To: 'Egon H. Varju'; EMC-PSTC Subject: RE: Y3K Oh my last birthday my

Re: Y3K

2000-01-07 Thread Derek Walton
- From: Egon H. Varju [mailto:e...@varju.bc.ca] Sent: Thursday, January 06, 2000 9:17 AM To: EMC-PSTC Subject:Re: Y3K Roger, way back in the days of the caveman, 1M ohms = 1000 ohms. Guess going

Re: Y3K

2000-01-07 Thread Mark
Anyway, in waxing nostalgic, I wonder how many of us recall the CPS unit. :-) Best regards, Ron Pickard rpick...@hypercom.com When I was at school, we used fps Imperial units. Then everything changed and we used cgs (centimetre, gram, second). Then we changed again, to mks (metre,

RE: Y3K

2000-01-06 Thread Gary McInturff
- From: Egon H. Varju [mailto:e...@varju.bc.ca] Sent: Thursday, January 06, 2000 9:17 AM To: EMC-PSTC Subject:Re: Y3K Roger, way back in the days of the caveman, 1M ohms = 1000 ohms. Guess going

Re: Y3K

2000-01-06 Thread Egon H. Varju
Roger, way back in the days of the caveman, 1M ohms = 1000 ohms. Guess going metric changed everything. Strange ... During my dinosaur hunting days, 1M ohm used to be = 1 000 000 ohms. Maybe we grew up in parallel universes ... Egon :-) __ Egon

Re: Y3K

2000-01-06 Thread Ron Pickard/Hypercom/US
: Re: Y3K owner-emc-pst c...@ieee.org

Re: Y3K

2000-01-05 Thread Ralph Cameron
Subject: RE: Y3K Personally I'm still waiting for another 48 years until the Y2K bug bites! Aside from its real meaning as degrees Kelvin, capital K was first used by the computer guys as a de-facto agreed unit for binary thousand (1024) as in Kbytes. Sloppiness by the financial community led

RE: Y3K

2000-01-05 Thread roger . viles
Personally I'm still waiting for another 48 years until the Y2K bug bites! Aside from its real meaning as degrees Kelvin, capital K was first used by the computer guys as a de-facto agreed unit for binary thousand (1024) as in Kbytes. Sloppiness by the financial community led to its use there

RE: Y3K

2000-01-05 Thread Jon Griver
...@dixonsasia.com.hk] Sent: Wednesday, January 05, 2000 1:32 AM To: Robert Johnson Cc: IEEE Subject: Re: Y3K Robert, Could you please tell us what the contents of Y3k.doc as it cannot be opened by Word 97. Thanks, Raymond Li Robert Johnson robe

RE: Y3K

2000-01-05 Thread James, Chris
- From: raymond...@dixonsasia.com.hk [mailto:raymond...@dixonsasia.com.hk] Sent: Wednesday, January 05, 2000 1:32 AM To: Robert Johnson Cc: IEEE Subject: Re: Y3K Robert, Could you please tell us what the contents of Y3k.doc as it cannot be opened by Word 97. Thanks, Raymond Li

Re: Y3K

2000-01-05 Thread Raymond . Li
Robert, Could you please tell us what the contents of Y3k.doc as it cannot be opened by Word 97. Thanks, Raymond Li Robert Johnson robe...@ma.ultranet.com on 05/01/2000 06:07:08 a Please respond to Robert Johnson robe...@ma.ultranet.com To: