RE: UL approval IT equipment

2001-09-08 Thread Doug McKean
You *could be* right. I've been in this situation several times. Let me explain. My golden rule is - the burden of power supply approvals should be on the mfr. I don't negotiate on this point ever. Two things could happen if you don't follow this rule: 1. You can certainly go for just

Re: UL approval IT equipment

2001-09-08 Thread amund
Thanks for all response. What I have learned from this session is, always use a UL recognized power supply (PS) if you want to get your end product UL listed. Do not interfere with non-recognized PS, that might cause you trouble later, especially during the UL audits and it will also require

Re: UL approval IT equipment

2001-09-07 Thread John Woodgate
I read in !emc-pstc that am...@westin.org wrote (in 20010907130815.1903 0.qm...@www2.nameplanet.com) about 'UL approval IT equipment', on Fri, 7 Sep 2001: We want our IT product to be UL approved. We purchase a modified power supply (PS) which is not UL appoved. The original PS is UL approved

RE: UL approval IT equipment

2001-09-07 Thread PGodfrey
: am...@westin.org [mailto:am...@westin.org] Sent: Friday, September 07, 2001 8:08 AM To: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org Subject: UL approval IT equipment What about this one: We want our IT product to be UL approved. We purchase a modified power supply (PS) which is not UL appoved. The original PS

Re: UL approval IT equipment

2001-09-07 Thread Rich Nute
Hi Amund: We want our IT product to be UL approved. We purchase a modified power supply (PS) which is not UL appoved. The original PS is UL approved. The only difference in the PS is the value of one resistor which means that we now can take 2.3A/28VDC out instead of

Re: UL approval IT equipment

2001-09-07 Thread Terry Meck
I have also been down this road. We insist he supply manufacturer add the new version to their `recognized' file. If it doesn't affect the critical components transformer etc. it should be a minor update to their file. This way you have a recognized component that is traceable. If it isn't

RE: UL approval IT equipment

2001-09-07 Thread John Juhasz
, NY -Original Message- From: am...@westin.org [mailto:am...@westin.org] Sent: Friday, September 07, 2001 9:08 AM To: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org Subject: UL approval IT equipment What about this one: We want our IT product to be UL approved. We purchase a modified power supply (PS

UL approval IT equipment

2001-09-07 Thread amund
What about this one: We want our IT product to be UL approved. We purchase a modified power supply (PS) which is not UL appoved. The original PS is UL approved. The only difference in the PS is the value of one resistor which means that we now can take 2.3A/28VDC out instead of 1.9/28VDC. It