RE: Violation of IEEE emc-pstc advertising rule

2003-02-13 Thread Peter L. Tarver
> From: Hudson, Alan > Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2003 4:00 AM > > b...@lyons.demon.co.uk wrote: > > > > Is it possible to set the server to reject or > require curtailment of > > messages over a reasonable limit - say 10K? > > ...and even perhaps reject *any* postings made in HTML !! And

RE: Violation of IEEE emc-pstc advertising rule

2003-02-13 Thread Hudson, Alan
b...@lyons.demon.co.uk wrote: > > Is it possible to set the server to reject or require curtailment of > messages over a reasonable limit - say 10K? ...and even perhaps reject *any* postings made in HTML !! :-) Alan -- Alenia Marconi Systems Scotland *

Re: Violation of IEEE emc-pstc advertising rule

2003-02-13 Thread b...@lyons.demon.co.uk
Richard and associates, I was delighted to see your message of 12 Feb 2003 17:29 <200302130129.raa05...@epgc264.sdd.hp.com> in which you wrote: > A message was posted by the EMC Compliance > Management Group that was a blatant violation > of our rules against advertising. > > The subscriber h

Violation of IEEE emc-pstc advertising rule

2003-02-12 Thread Rich Nute
A message was posted by the EMC Compliance Management Group that was a blatant violation of our rules against advertising. The subscriber has been un-subscribed and notified as to the reason. Richard Nute Administrator, IEEE emc-pstc listserver This message is from the IEEE EMC So