subject:"\[PSES\] Fwd\: \[PSES\] Was there ever a comparison between IEC 60950\-1 and IEC 62368\-1 \(current edition preferable\)\? And any rationale for any of the changes"

Re: [PSES] Fwd: [PSES] Was there ever a comparison between IEC 60950-1 and IEC 62368-1 (current edition preferable)? And any rationale for any of the changes

2017-12-07 Thread Pete Perkins

Leo, They should make you the convenor of the group to harmonize upgrading the requirements between 60601 and 62368 since you know how to get input in a hurry. :>) :>) br, Pete Peter E Perkins, PE Principal Product Safety & Regulatory Affairs Consultant PO

[PSES] Fwd: [PSES] Was there ever a comparison between IEC 60950-1 and IEC 62368-1 (current edition preferable)? And any rationale for any of the changes

2017-12-07 Thread Leo Eisner

It seems like my e-mail response got bounced so I am sending again. Apologies if a duplicate. > > Thx to all your feedback and I clearly get the point these are very different > standards but changing from using bits and pieces of IEC 60950-1 to IEC > 62368-1 in our draft IEC 60601-1, 3rd ed.