Re: [PSES] Working towards compliance as per the EN 55032

2016-10-19 Thread Rajneesh Raveendran
. > > > > Ghery > > > > *From:* Charlie Blackham [mailto:char...@sulisconsultants.com] > *Sent:* Wednesday, October 19, 2016 1:34 AM > *To:* Ghery S. Pettit; EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG > > *Subject:* RE: [PSES] Working towards compliance as per the EN 55032 >

Re: [PSES] Working towards compliance as per the EN 55032

2016-10-19 Thread Ghery S. Pettit
compliance with EN 55032. No new testing and away they go. Ghery From: Charlie Blackham [mailto:char...@sulisconsultants.com] Sent: Wednesday, October 19, 2016 1:34 AM To: Ghery S. Pettit; EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG Subject: RE: [PSES] Working towards compliance as per the EN 55032

Re: [PSES] Working towards compliance as per the EN 55032

2016-10-19 Thread Charlie Blackham
...@sulisconsultants.com] Sent: Tuesday, October 18, 2016 1:56 PM To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG<mailto:EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG> Subject: Re: [PSES] Working towards compliance as per the EN 55032 > What is not correct? The statement “Products leaving the factory after that must meet EN 55032” Is no

Re: [PSES] Working towards compliance as per the EN 55032

2016-10-18 Thread Ghery S. Pettit
, 2016 1:56 PM To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG Subject: Re: [PSES] Working towards compliance as per the EN 55032 > What is not correct? The statement “Products leaving the factory after that must meet EN 55032” Is not correct There is no requirement for that anywhere. Regards Char

Re: [PSES] Working towards compliance as per the EN 55032

2016-10-18 Thread Charlie Blackham
STC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG Subject: RE: [PSES] Working towards compliance as per the EN 55032 A simple, undefined assertion is of no value. What is not correct? With best wishes DESIGN IT IN! OOO – Own Opinions Only www.jmwa.demon.co.uk<http://www.jmwa.demon.co.uk/> J M Woodgate and Associates Rayleig

Re: [PSES] Working towards compliance as per the EN 55032

2016-10-18 Thread Charlie Blackham
Your previous comment….. >From: John Woodgate [mailto:jmw1...@btinternet.com] >Sent: 18 October 2016 18:24 >To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG >Subject: Re: [PSES] Working towards compliance as per the EN 55032 >Yes, the docopocoss for EN 55022 is 5 March 2017. Products leaving the

Re: [PSES] Working towards compliance as per the EN 55032

2016-10-18 Thread John Woodgate
ISTSERV.IEEE.ORG Subject: RE: [PSES] Working towards compliance as per the EN 55032 > What is not correct? The statement “Products leaving the factory after that must meet EN 55032” Is not correct There is no requirement for that anywhere. Regards Charlie From: John Woodgate [mailto:jmw

Re: [PSES] Working towards compliance as per the EN 55032

2016-10-18 Thread John Woodgate
o:char...@sulisconsultants.com] Sent: Tuesday, October 18, 2016 9:31 PM To: John Woodgate ; EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG Subject: RE: [PSES] Working towards compliance as per the EN 55032 Your previous comment….. >From: John Woodgate [mailto:jmw1...@btinternet.com] >Sent: 18 October 2016 18:24 &

Re: [PSES] Working towards compliance as per the EN 55032

2016-10-18 Thread John Woodgate
te and Associates Rayleigh England Sylvae in aeternum manent. From: Charlie Blackham [mailto:char...@sulisconsultants.com] Sent: Tuesday, October 18, 2016 8:13 PM To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG Subject: Re: [PSES] Working towards compliance as per the EN 55032 Rajneesh Please note, complianc

Re: [PSES] Working towards compliance as per the EN 55032

2016-10-18 Thread Bill Stumpf
EN 55032 and EN 55022 are harmonized Standards which can be tested to in order for presumption of conformity to the EMC Directive. Once EN 55022 is withdrawn you will need to update your DOC to indicate compliance with EN 55032, assuming you continue to use the Harmonized Standard route to comp

Re: [PSES] Working towards compliance as per the EN 55032

2016-10-18 Thread Charlie Blackham
Rajneesh Please note, compliance with EN 55032 is not “required” after March 2017 any more than EN 55022 is “required” now – it might be heavily recommended, but it is not “required”. A Harmonised Standard: · Provides a presumption of Conformity with a Directive · Is what mark

Re: [PSES] Working towards compliance as per the EN 55032

2016-10-18 Thread John Woodgate
Yes, the docopocoss for EN 55022 is 5 March 2017. Products leaving the factory after that must meet EN 55032. With best wishes DESIGN IT IN! OOO – Own Opinions Only www.jmwa.demon.co.uk J M Woodgate and Associates Rayleigh England Sylvae in aeternum manent. F

Re: [PSES] Working towards compliance as per the EN 55032

2016-10-18 Thread Ghery S. Pettit
Rajneesh, You are correct in your understanding. Existing products will have to be shown to be compliant with EN 55032 by March of next year. The good news is that you may be able to get the lab to evaluate how the testing to EN 55022 was performed and if it is still compliant with EN 5503