-dmarc-requ...@ieee.org>>
*Sent:* Tuesday, March 13, 2018 8:57 AM
*To:* EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG <mailto:EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG>
*Subject:* Re: [PSES] insulation between SELV and protective earthed
accessible part- IEC 62052-31
Hi Vyas,
I'm not familiar with this standar
...@woodjohn.uk]
Sent: 14 March 2018 00:58
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] insulation between SELV and protective earthed accessible
part- IEC 62052-31
I agree: SELV as a low-voltage earth-free supply is not actually a safe
concept. It's OK for short connections in the same space
ubject:* Re: [PSES] insulation between SELV and protective earthed
accessible part- IEC 62052-31
Hi Vyas,
I'm not familiar with this standard, but the general principle is that
2 levels of protection are required to protect operators from hazards.
In the case of the "protective earthed acce
: Scott Aldous
<0220f70c299a-dmarc-requ...@ieee.org<mailto:0220f70c299a-dmarc-requ...@ieee.org>>
Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2018 8:57 AM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG<mailto:EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG>
Subject: Re: [PSES] insulation between SELV and protective earthed accessibl
I agree: SELV as a low-voltage earth-free supply is not actually a safe
concept. It's OK for short connections in the same space, because the
probability of 'power cross' is extremely remote. But if SELV is
extended into several spaces, including, for example, a void, the chance
of
Dear Mr. Vyas:
I suggest you review the definitions for SELV and PELV in IEC 62052. These
definitions are not the same throughout IEC standards. (I don’t have IEC
62052.)
In some standards, SELV is isolated from protective earth, and PELV is
connected to protective earth. If these
Hi Vyas,
I'm not familiar with this standard, but the general principle is that 2
levels of protection are required to protect operators from hazards. In the
case of the "protective earthed accessible part", I imagine the standard
assumes that a single fault could compromise the protective
7 matches
Mail list logo