Re: [Emc-users] Preview on a robot arm

2011-05-13 Thread Viesturs Lācis
2011/5/14 dave > > On Fri, 2011-05-13 at 22:55 -0400, Kyle Kerr wrote: > > On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 8:15 PM, andy pugh > > >>> It's mm, not inches, I expect. > > >>> > > >> 39 inches/min is nothing to sneeze at. > > > > > > 1mm/min is 390 in/min. > > > > > > Even less to sneeze at. > > DOH! dam

Re: [Emc-users] Preview on a robot arm

2011-05-13 Thread dave
On Fri, 2011-05-13 at 22:55 -0400, Kyle Kerr wrote: > On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 8:15 PM, andy pugh > >>> It's mm, not inches, I expect. > >>> > >> 39 inches/min is nothing to sneeze at. > > > > 1mm/min is 390 in/min. > > > > Even less to sneeze at. > DOH! damn decimal :P > > Orders of magnitude

Re: [Emc-users] Preview on a robot arm

2011-05-13 Thread Kyle Kerr
On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 8:15 PM, andy pugh >>> It's mm, not inches, I expect. >>> >> 39 inches/min is nothing to sneeze at. > > 1mm/min is 390 in/min. > > Even less to sneeze at. DOH! damn decimal :P > > -- > atp > "Torque wrenches are for the obedience of fools and the guidance of wise men" -

Re: [Emc-users] Preview on a robot arm

2011-05-13 Thread andy pugh
On 14 May 2011 01:09, Kyle Kerr wrote: > On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 5:38 PM, andy pugh wrote: > >> >> It's mm, not inches, I expect. >> > 39 inches/min is nothing to sneeze at. 1mm/min is 390 in/min. Even less to sneeze at. -- atp "Torque wrenches are for the obedience of fools and the guida

Re: [Emc-users] Preview on a robot arm

2011-05-13 Thread Kyle Kerr
On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 5:38 PM, andy pugh wrote: > > It's mm, not inches, I expect. > 39 inches/min is nothing to sneeze at. > -- > atp > "Torque wrenches are for the obedience of fools and the guidance of wise men" --

Re: [Emc-users] Preview on a robot arm

2011-05-13 Thread andy pugh
On 13 May 2011 22:08, Frank Tkalcevic wrote: >> after taking that video I started >> tweaking acceleration and velocity and the arm is capable to deliver >> 1/min rapid speed of the "controlled point" > > I can't wait for a video of that. It's mm, not inches, I expect. -- atp "Torque wrench

Re: [Emc-users] Preview on a robot arm

2011-05-13 Thread Frank Tkalcevic
> after taking that video I started > tweaking acceleration and velocity and the arm is capable to deliver > 1/min rapid speed of the "controlled point" I can't wait for a video of that. -- Achieve unprecedented ap

Re: [Emc-users] Preview on a robot arm

2011-05-13 Thread Viesturs Lācis
2011/5/13 Viesturs Lācis : > 2011/5/13 andy pugh : >> >> Was that a different issue to the spurious conversion of linear units >> from degrees to radians inside genserkins? >> > > No it is the same thing, I remember that You pointed it out, when I > brought this up in the thread, where I described

[Emc-users] Google chooses Arduino for "Android accessory"

2011-05-13 Thread Igor Chudov
Wow. http://blog.makezine.com/archive/2011/05/why-google-choosing-arduino-matters-and-the-end-of-made-for-ipod-tm.html -- Achieve unprecedented app performance and reliability What every C/C++ and Fortran developer should

Re: [Emc-users] Preview on a robot arm

2011-05-13 Thread Viesturs Lācis
2011/5/13 andy pugh : > > TYPE(link) I think. > You also need to do the 1 to 1 conversion of jest back to joint in the > second section for non-rotary joints > Ok, thanks! I will report back, when I will try to compile these changes and test on simulated arm. Viesturs ---

Re: [Emc-users] Preview on a robot arm

2011-05-13 Thread andy pugh
On 13 May 2011 12:01, Viesturs Lācis wrote: > Is that correct? Or should it be TYPE(link) instead of TYPE(t)? TYPE(link) I think. You also need to do the 1 to 1 conversion of jest back to joint in the second section for non-rotary joints -- atp "Torque wrenches are for the obedience of fools a

Re: [Emc-users] Parallel robots

2011-05-13 Thread Andrew
2011/5/13 Klemen Dovrtel > Interesting stuff :) > I also saw some robots with four arms ( > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0-Kpv-ZOcKY&feature=related). What is the > difference between this one and delta robot with three arms - is there an > extra degree of freedom? > Yes, they have extra rotat

Re: [Emc-users] Preview on a robot arm

2011-05-13 Thread Viesturs Lācis
2011/5/13 Andrew : > > If I had a draft of what you want to get - kinematics, angles, joints etc, > I'd try to figure it out. > I know matrices, coordinate transformations etc. Wow, thanks!!! I will try to describe it all in a reasonable way and send You within a few days. 2011/5/13 andy pugh : >

Re: [Emc-users] Preview on a robot arm

2011-05-13 Thread andy pugh
On 13 May 2011 06:46, Viesturs Lācis wrote: > 2) there were differences in scale between joint and teleop modes - > there was very large difference in the travel distance of linear > joint, when compared if I jogged some number of units in joint mode or > in teleop mode. Was that a different iss

Re: [Emc-users] Parallel robots

2011-05-13 Thread Klemen Dovrtel
Interesting stuff :) I also saw some robots with four arms (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0-Kpv-ZOcKY&feature=related). What is the difference between this one and delta robot with three arms - is there an extra degree of freedom? Regards Klemen --- On Fri, 5/13/11, Andrew wrote: > From: A