Greetings all;
I had asked for an explanation of why the run trace, and the initial
trace, do not align in the backplot, and it was suggested that I was
using something in the G90 to G92 in my code. So It removed any of that
from my code, with no effect detectable in removing them.
The first
On 11 October 2015 at 06:23, Willy Snow wrote:
> I do lspci -vvv and search for 9900 device. Then I use the first I/O port.
> >From below the I/O is e010 so my port is 0e010. Worked great!!
It's a bit strange that it moved, the earlier lspci -vv had it at
0xd010. Have you
Gene,
Can you attach the G code that you ran?
JT
On 10/11/2015 3:51 AM, Gene Heskett wrote:
> Greetings all;
>
> I had asked for an explanation of why the run trace, and the initial
> trace, do not align in the backplot, and it was suggested that I was
> using something in the G90 to G92 in my
On Sunday 11 October 2015 07:06:44 John Thornton wrote:
> Gene,
>
> Can you attach the G code that you ran?
>
> JT
>
Attached John. It is a mess, a mass of control switches because its
intended to do all 4 side parts, and all 4 base parts, just by setting
control vars at the top of the file.
On 11 October 2015 at 18:38, Willy Snow wrote:
> So it works fine in Stepconf Wizard, but not in LCNC.
Is there a reason not to use the HAL file created by Stepconf?
> I assume I need to add "loadrt hal_parport cfg="0e010" to my hal file. Does
> it matter where it goes?
On Sunday 11 October 2015 14:32:08 John Thornton wrote:
> Wow that is a mess...
You are being too kind..
> the first thing I noticed is your wrapping your
> code with % AND using a program end M2. You only use one or the other.
> M2 resets a bunch of things (see the manual) and %% does not.
>
> It's a bit strange that it moved, the earlier lspci -vv had it at
> 0xd010. Have you changed PCI slots?
>
> --
> atp
> If you can't fix it, you don't own it.
> http://www.ifixit.com/Manifesto
Hi Andy,
I swapped it out while troubleshooting.
So it works fine in Stepconf Wizard, but not in
Wow that is a mess... the first thing I noticed is your wrapping your
code with % AND using a program end M2. You only use one or the other.
M2 resets a bunch of things (see the manual) and %% does not.
I commented out the G38 and corresponding G10 lines and the back plot as
viewed from Z is
>Is there a reason not to use the HAL file created by Stepconf?
>> I assume I need to add "loadrt hal_parport cfg="0e010" to my hal file. Does
>> it matter where it goes?
>It has to go near the top, before any HAL lines that try to addf the
>threads and net the pins.
I start with my hal file
On Mon, 12 Oct 2015, Karlsson & Wang wrote:
> Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2015 00:04:31 +0200
> From: Karlsson & Wang
> Reply-To: "Enhanced Machine Controller (EMC)"
>
> To: emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: [Emc-users]
On 11 October 2015 at 20:56, Willy Snow wrote:
> loadrt hal_parport cfg="0e010" [**tried adding here and other places
> but only get errors]
What errors?
--
atp
If you can't fix it, you don't own it.
http://www.ifixit.com/Manifesto
On 11 October 2015 at 20:56, Willy Snow wrote:
> loadrt hal_parport cfg="0e010"
Should be "0xE010"
--
atp
If you can't fix it, you don't own it.
http://www.ifixit.com/Manifesto
--
You have SIM config checked on the first page?
- Reply message -
From: "andy pugh"
To: "Enhanced Machine Controller (EMC)"
Subject: [Emc-users] Problem Connecting LCNC to G540 from PCIE Port
Date: Sun, Oct 11, 2015 2:04 PM
On 11
On 11 October 2015 at 22:39, Chris Morley wrote:
> You have SIM config checked on the first page?
Well spotted!
Bill, you need to either un-select "simulator" in stepconf, or swap
"sim_parport" for "hal_parport" in your hal.
--
atp
If you can't fix it, you don't
On 10/11/2015 2:14 PM, Gene Heskett wrote:
> On Sunday 11 October 2015 14:32:08 John Thornton wrote:
>
>> the first thing I noticed is your wrapping your
>> code with % AND using a program end M2. You only use one or the other.
>> M2 resets a bunch of things (see the manual) and %% does not.
>
I am trying to use two ethernet cards at the same time with the hostmot2 driver
but get an error message "waitpid failed". I suspect this is because I try to
load the low level driver twice, do anybody have an idea if this might be the
case?
Regards Nicklas Karlsson
Well spotted!
Bill, you need to either un-select "simulator" in stepconf, or swap
"sim_parport" for "hal_parport" in your hal.
Doh!
Got it running. Thanks everyone!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BlfAynGyWaU=youtu.be
Bill
>
What is a good and usable configuration for a machine to drive my beginner
3-axis CNC router?
Is Raspberry Pi or BeagleBone Black an easy solution, or would getting an
old desktop still a more bullet proof (and easy to implement) solution?
Thanks for your time!
Raspberry is out. Not fast enough. The Beagle works because it has two
PSUs which are peripheral processors that take care of the stepping for you.
Thing is, you'lll need some sort of cape for the Beagle which costs extra.
You'll need some sort of Break Out Board (BOB) for the PC and perhaps
On Sunday 11 October 2015 16:55:11 John Thornton wrote:
> On 10/11/2015 2:14 PM, Gene Heskett wrote:
> > On Sunday 11 October 2015 14:32:08 John Thornton wrote:
> >> the first thing I noticed is your wrapping your
> >> code with % AND using a program end M2. You only use one or the
> >> other. M2
One clarification - LinuxCNC is only supported on PC hardware. The
MachineKit fork of LinuxCNC supports ARM processors, and many
people are using it on BeagleBoneBlacks, particularly for 3D printers.
MachineKit is much more "bleeding edge" than LinuxCNC, though, so
if you are looking for a
On 10/11/2015 6:11 PM, John Dammeyer wrote:
> Raspberry is out. Not fast enough. The Beagle works because it has two
> PSUs which are peripheral processors that take care of the stepping for you.
>
> Thing is, you'lll need some sort of cape for the Beagle which costs extra.
> You'll need some
The "waitpid" error is a very generic error that indicates some
sub-program has failed. So look for other messages that give a more
specific indication of the problem.
Here is a loadrt line I used when I was testing 3 hostmot2 ethernet
boards:
loadrt hm2_eth config="num_encoders=1
23 matches
Mail list logo