Re: [Emc-users] Avoiding probe crash

I agree. The current behaviour in MDI is to feed hold and abort the rest of the motion. That should also work for auto. Les On 05/12/17 22:14, Greg Bentzinger via Emc-users wrote: I like Seb's version with the exception that a probe trigger E-stop. Personally I would prefer the option to

Re: [Emc-users] Avoiding probe crash

I perhaps have a little different perspective since we use probe moves with plasma systems where the "probe" is the torch tip and is either ohmic sensing or a switch mechanically activated when the torch is pressed against the metal. 2.7 does not ignore all spurious trips, because it will

Re: [Emc-users] Avoiding probe crash

On 12/05/2017 03:28 PM, Sebastian Kuzminsky wrote: I'm also sympathetic to Jon Elson's opinion that a spurious probe trip is essentially a misconfigured/glitchy machine, and it's the user's job to fix it somehow (possibly using some HAL logic to control the signal that Christian proposed).

Re: [Emc-users] Avoiding probe crash

On Tuesday 05 December 2017 17:02:53 Ken Strauss wrote: > > -Original Message- > > From: Sebastian Kuzminsky [mailto:s...@highlab.com] > > Sent: Tuesday, December 05, 2017 4:29 PM > > To: Enhanced Machine Controller (EMC); Kurt Jacobson > > Subject: Re: [Emc-users] Avoiding probe crash >

Re: [Emc-users] Avoiding probe crash

On 12/05/2017 03:14 PM, Greg Bentzinger via Emc-users wrote: I like Seb's version with the exception that a probe trigger E-stop. Personally I would prefer the option to invoke a motion/feed hold command with alarm vrs E-stop since many machines can stop faster under power. I don't like Pause

Re: [Emc-users] Avoiding probe crash

I like Seb's version with the exception that a probe trigger E-stop. Personally I would prefer the option to invoke a motion/feed hold command with alarm vrs E-stop since many machines can stop faster under power. Greg --

Re: [Emc-users] Avoiding probe crash

> -Original Message- > From: Sebastian Kuzminsky [mailto:s...@highlab.com] > Sent: Tuesday, December 05, 2017 4:29 PM > To: Enhanced Machine Controller (EMC); Kurt Jacobson > Subject: Re: [Emc-users] Avoiding probe crash > > On 12/05/2017 12:05 PM, Kurt Jacobson wrote: > > I like

Re: [Emc-users] Avoiding probe crash

On 12/05/2017 12:05 PM, Kurt Jacobson wrote: I like Cristian's idea of having a "stop on unexpected probe trip" HAL pin, defaulting to TRUE. That seems the most flexible, and then even a remap could set/unset it if needed for some reason. On Tue, Dec 5, 2017 at 1:58 PM, Ken Strauss

Re: [Emc-users] Avoiding probe crash

I like Cristian's idea of having a "stop on unexpected probe trip" HAL pin, defaulting to TRUE. That seems the most flexible, and then even a remap could set/unset it if needed for some reason. On Tue, Dec 5, 2017 at 1:58 PM, Ken Strauss wrote: > Perhaps too much to ask

Re: [Emc-users] Avoiding probe crash

Perhaps too much to ask but having the "stop on unexpected probe trip" behavior driven by a tool table parameter would be even better. That would eliminate the need to modify existing probe routines. > -Original Message- > From: Cristian Bontas [mailto:cristianbonta...@gmail.com] >

Re: [Emc-users] Avoiding probe crash

On 12/05/2017 09:56 AM, Jon Elson wrote: On 12/05/2017 08:11 AM, Les Newell wrote: Yup, I can confirm it ignores probe when in auto. If the probe is not tripped, and the non-probe auto move touches the probe, it just keeps on moving? That is really wrong!  I'm pretty sure my old 2.7.x does

Re: [Emc-users] Avoiding probe crash

On 12/05/2017 08:11 AM, Les Newell wrote: Yup, I can confirm it ignores probe when in auto. If the probe is not tripped, and the non-probe auto move touches the probe, it just keeps on moving? That is really wrong! I'm pretty sure my old 2.7.x does stop with an error message. Jon

Re: [Emc-users] Tech Shop goes out of business

On 12/04/2017 09:36 PM, Danny Miller wrote: I saw this info, including a non-public letter to their investors. It declared an intent, yes. BUT lemme say it's "out there". It does not look like a professional business move. It doesn't look like it's even in accordance with acceptable

Re: [Emc-users] Avoiding probe crash

Yup, I can confirm it ignores probe when in auto. Les On 04/12/2017 18:09, Rene Hopf wrote: On 4. Dec 2017, at 18:49, Les Newell wrote: G0 and G1 were MDI but I guess it will work the same in auto. it does make a differente. it also makes a difference if the