On Wed, Aug 8, 2018, 12:59 PM Todd Zuercher wrote:
> If the behavior is anything like the Z inhibit button on all the Fanuc
> machines I've worked with it is a horribly dangerous device. On the Fanuc
> machines (modern newer ones with absolute encoders included) it is the
> equivalent of
If the behavior is anything like the Z inhibit button on all the Fanuc machines
I've worked with it is a horribly dangerous device. On the Fanuc machines
(modern newer ones with absolute encoders included) it is the equivalent of
disconnecting the outputs of the stepgen and nothing else. When
On 08/07/2018 09:17 PM, Brent Loschen wrote:
And now for my question. The old Bridgeport had a button
on the front panel titled "No Z" that turned off all z
motion and let me "air mill" a part as a sanity check of
my X & Y boundaries/fixtures. I can't find the equivalent
functionality
Thanks for those pin names Andy, and great point about a premature
toggle of the "No Z" button. I'm not sure what the original BP did if
you attempted to disable the No Z button while a program was running.
Given the safety features of that old BP control, I tend to think that
the button
On Tue, Aug 7, 2018, 11:54 PM Ralph Stirling
wrote:
> #24 stranded won't be reliable with those red connectors. They are made
> for #22 stranded wire. You need the white 640441 connectors for #24.
>
Thank you, yep that's my observation, unreliable.
>
>
>
https://www.thingiverse.com/thing:624625
Quoting Chris Albertson :
Sorry I thought he was making the scroll. Actually I thought the project
was to make an entire chuck.
Not reading closely enough I guess.
Tes 100%, if you can do the axis reversal in air, that is the place. Good
Idea.
No,
On 08/07/2018 08:22 PM, jrmitchellj wrote:
Joint 2 error on a 2 axis machine, hmm.
Would it only have joint 0 & 1?
Is it possible you opened a 3 axis config?
J. Ray Mitchell Jr.
“No thief, however skillful, can rob one of knowledge, and that is why
knowledge is the best and safest treasure to
On 08/07/2018 07:34 PM, Peter C. Wallace wrote:
The following error really suggests a thread /configuration issue
(latency gone bad, missing thread etc etc) Almost nothing interface
hardware wise should be able to cause a following error.
I would try out stepconfs test proceedure to verify
On 08/08/2018 03:01 AM, Marcus Bowman wrote:
The joint 2 following error is likely stopping it before it can move
the on-screen DRO more than 2 or 3 counts if that far.
Two thoughts:
First: I had a joint following error which occurred because the machine was
trying to exceed acceleration
On 08/07/2018 08:29 PM, Gene Heskett wrote:
Compaq desktop computer. Two PCI parallel port cards. Heavy duty
parallel cables I bought years ago. You'd have to hit 'em with a .50
BMG to do any damage to them. Both cables ohm'd out good. Both cards
are well seated in their respective PCI slots.
On Wednesday 08 August 2018 03:12:51 Marcus Bowman wrote:
> So now, instead of learning a little, you have learned a LOT.
> Congratulations. Make a nice badge with lots of engraved detail, and
> wear it proudly. I can't answer your AXIS button question, although I
> imagine it is not a difficult
On 8 August 2018 at 03:17, Brent Loschen wrote:
> And now for my question. The old Bridgeport had a button on the front panel
> titled "No Z" that turned off all z motion and let me "air mill" a part as a
> sanity check of my X & Y boundaries/fixtures. I can't find the equivalent
>
On 8 Aug 2018, at 01:29, Gene Heskett wrote:
> On Tuesday 07 August 2018 19:26:41 Mark Wendt wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Aug 7, 2018, 19:03 Gene Heskett wrote:
>>> The joint 2 following error is likely stopping it before it can move
>>> the on-screen DRO more than 2 or 3 counts if that far.
Two
Sorry I thought he was making the scroll. Actually I thought the project
was to make an entire chuck.
Not reading closely enough I guess.
Tes 100%, if you can do the axis reversal in air, that is the place. Good
Idea.
No, not at all. Once the tool is out of the materiel, you can lift to
>
14 matches
Mail list logo
