Kirk Wallace wrote:
> I like the wiki idea. I can look into this, but hints on how to start
> a wiki would be welcome.
We use twiki internally. It seems to work quite well. But I don't know
how to set something like that up for public access, and I would not
relish the idea of administering such
Kirk,
I've been using synergy quite a bit for the last few weeks, and I'm
beginning to get the hang of it.
You mention starting a web page... I think a mail list or wiki of some
sort would be very helpful for Synergy. I think Dave Engvall has
mentioned this before, too. Synergy is kind of hard t
ive with zero. If
> anyone knows how to make that work I'd be interested.
>
> Synergy will let you rough with a tool that is tool big and then come
> back with a smaller tool and just cleanup the inside corners. Really
> a handy feature.
>
> HTH
>
> Dave
&g
I'm pretty sure I've seen this asked before, but I couldn't find it in
the archives for this mail list.
I'm running EMC2. I get this error on lines with G2 or G3 in them. (The
code is output from Synergy). If I get this error, is there still a
setting (like INCH_TOLERANCE) that will relax the con
in sharing notes. But I don't want to bother
anybody if this seems off topic. Does anyone have any thoughts on this?
Maybe if there isn't a clear up or down vote I just post a question or
two and then I'll stop if it seems to drift off topic.
Th
Till,
Thanks so much for keeping this! We've used it just a bit here and I
will keep trying it as I have more new pieces to machine.
Ben
Till Harbaum / Lists wrote:
> Hi,
>
> i finished a new version and the main new features are:
>
> - Support for text (thanks to the truetypetracer)
> - Supp
Till Harbaum / Lists wrote:
> I wondering if i am doing a useless job since someone else already
> did this or there's some other editor i am missing. Do you know of
> something as simple as xfig being able to write gcode? Do you think
> such an xfig patcg would be a useful contribution?
I think
