2012/1/23 Michael Haberler mai...@mah.priv.at:
What I do blame you for, and what I take issue with, is the style and
attitude in which you have come to, and implemented your decision, which is
symptomatic for how the EMC2 project is run, and what is wrong with it from a
steering
On 25 January 2012 20:53, s...@highlab.com s...@highlab.com wrote:
People are saying thing like:
What's the road map of features for future releases?
What features should/shouldn't I work on?
These kinds of questions make no sense in my mental model of the project.
I see your point, but
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 09:07:14PM +, andy pugh wrote:
I see your point, but that does leave a bit of a problem.
Currently I can have a great idea for a modification to LinuxCNC. I
can spend months working on it to get it to the point where it can be
demonstrated. Then somebody can say
On 23 January 2012 21:46, Chris Morley chrisinnana...@hotmail.com wrote:
I will add my voice at least so Michael knows he is not the only one
who feels this way.
And I.
It seems almost impossible to get any idea what ideas are worth
developing, or which direction to go.
It is very difficult to
On Mon, 23 Jan 2012 22:17:17 +, you wrote:
On 23 January 2012 21:46, Chris Morley chrisinnana...@hotmail.com wrote:
I will add my voice at least so Michael knows he is not the only one
who feels this way.
And I.
It seems almost impossible to get any idea what ideas are worth
developing,
