Re: [Emc-users] 2.5 run-in-place or not

2012-01-23 Thread Jon Elson
Tom Easterday wrote: > We have been using the 2.5 branch and have made quite a few changes and have > things working nicely. We want to continue forward with 2.5 and abandon > 2.4.X. Should I just leave things alone, leave it in run-in-place mode, or > should I rebuild it without that (or is t

Re: [Emc-users] 2.5 run-in-place or not

2012-01-23 Thread Jon Elson
Tom Easterday wrote: > We have been using the 2.5 branch and have made quite a few changes and have > things working nicely. We want to continue forward with 2.5 and abandon > 2.4.X. Should I just leave things alone, leave it in run-in-place mode, or > should I rebuild it without that (or is t

Re: [Emc-users] 2.5 run-in-place or not

2012-01-23 Thread John Thornton
I have both ways with a script running a RIP and I have changed the installed version from the live cd to get the buildbot deb. I prefer the deb way as I will get the automatic update prompt. John On 1/22/2012 7:46 PM, Tom Easterday wrote: > We have been using the 2.5 branch and have made quite

Re: [Emc-users] 2.5 run-in-place or not

2012-01-23 Thread andy pugh
On 23 January 2012 01:46, Tom Easterday wrote: > We currently have to open a terminal, cd to ~/emc2/emc2-dev/ and do a . > scripts/environment and then run "emc". If you look at the icon properties you can see the command line that they run, and edit that to point at the run-in-place startup scr

Re: [Emc-users] 2.5 run-in-place or not

2012-01-23 Thread Michael Haberler
2 um 09:17 schrieb John Prentice: > > Subject: Re: [Emc-users] 2.5 run-in-place or not > > >> well, since people keep tripping over this glade install path issue I >> looked into it and it seems it can be fixed: >> >> === >> Glade 3.3.3 >&g

Re: [Emc-users] 2.5 run-in-place or not

2012-01-23 Thread John Prentice
Subject: Re: [Emc-users] 2.5 run-in-place or not > well, since people keep tripping over this glade install path issue I > looked into it and it seems it can be fixed: > > === > Glade 3.3.3 > === > ... >- Defined environment variables GLADE_MODULE_P

Re: [Emc-users] 2.5 run-in-place or not

2012-01-22 Thread Michael Haberler
well, since people keep tripping over this glade install path issue I looked into it and it seems it can be fixed: === Glade 3.3.3 === ... - Defined environment variables GLADE_MODULE_PATH & GLADE_CATALOG_PATH, catalogs will be searched in GLADE_CATALOG_PATH and widget

Re: [Emc-users] 2.5 run-in-place or not

2012-01-22 Thread Michael Haberler
Am 23.01.2012 um 02:46 schrieb Tom Easterday: > We have been using the 2.5 branch and have made quite a few changes and have > things working nicely. We want to continue forward with 2.5 and abandon > 2.4.X. Should I just leave things alone, leave it in run-in-place mode, or > should I rebui

[Emc-users] 2.5 run-in-place or not

2012-01-22 Thread Tom Easterday
We have been using the 2.5 branch and have made quite a few changes and have things working nicely. We want to continue forward with 2.5 and abandon 2.4.X. Should I just leave things alone, leave it in run-in-place mode, or should I rebuild it without that (or is there a way other than reinsta