Tom Easterday wrote:
> We have been using the 2.5 branch and have made quite a few changes and have
> things working nicely. We want to continue forward with 2.5 and abandon
> 2.4.X. Should I just leave things alone, leave it in run-in-place mode, or
> should I rebuild it without that (or is t
Tom Easterday wrote:
> We have been using the 2.5 branch and have made quite a few changes and have
> things working nicely. We want to continue forward with 2.5 and abandon
> 2.4.X. Should I just leave things alone, leave it in run-in-place mode, or
> should I rebuild it without that (or is t
I have both ways with a script running a RIP and I have changed the
installed version from the live cd to get the buildbot deb. I prefer the
deb way as I will get the automatic update prompt.
John
On 1/22/2012 7:46 PM, Tom Easterday wrote:
> We have been using the 2.5 branch and have made quite
On 23 January 2012 01:46, Tom Easterday wrote:
> We currently have to open a terminal, cd to ~/emc2/emc2-dev/ and do a .
> scripts/environment and then run "emc".
If you look at the icon properties you can see the command line that
they run, and edit that to point at the run-in-place startup scr
2 um 09:17 schrieb John Prentice:
>
> Subject: Re: [Emc-users] 2.5 run-in-place or not
>
>
>> well, since people keep tripping over this glade install path issue I
>> looked into it and it seems it can be fixed:
>>
>> ===
>> Glade 3.3.3
>&g
Subject: Re: [Emc-users] 2.5 run-in-place or not
> well, since people keep tripping over this glade install path issue I
> looked into it and it seems it can be fixed:
>
> ===
> Glade 3.3.3
> ===
> ...
>- Defined environment variables GLADE_MODULE_P
well, since people keep tripping over this glade install path issue I looked
into it and it seems it can be fixed:
===
Glade 3.3.3
===
...
- Defined environment variables GLADE_MODULE_PATH & GLADE_CATALOG_PATH,
catalogs will be
searched in GLADE_CATALOG_PATH and widget
Am 23.01.2012 um 02:46 schrieb Tom Easterday:
> We have been using the 2.5 branch and have made quite a few changes and have
> things working nicely. We want to continue forward with 2.5 and abandon
> 2.4.X. Should I just leave things alone, leave it in run-in-place mode, or
> should I rebui
We have been using the 2.5 branch and have made quite a few changes and have
things working nicely. We want to continue forward with 2.5 and abandon 2.4.X.
Should I just leave things alone, leave it in run-in-place mode, or should I
rebuild it without that (or is there a way other than reinsta
